Commentary
A Kindler, Gentler Microsoft Won't Happen From Within
Microsoft's recent announcements about its new openness initiatives have been greeted with great skepticism. They deserve to be, because Microsoft deserves to be changed for the better -- but it's only going to come from the outside, not the inside.
Microsoft's recent announcements about its new openness initiatives have been greeted with great skepticism. They deserve to be, because Microsoft deserves to be changed for the better -- but it's only going to come from the outside, not the inside.
More Software Insights
White Papers
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Reports
More >>Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- Outsourcing Security: What Every Potential Cloud Security Customer Should Know
I don't believe Steve Ballmer for a second when he says that the recent change in strategy to open up documentation about Windows and Office was something it was taking on its own. You can bet that this is only happening because of continual and unrelenting pressure from regulators, rivals, and, yes, customers to make this happen. It's not so much a way for the company to better embrace openness and connectedness as it is a face-saving gesture, a way to send a signal that, gee shucks, its really not all that bad.
Truth be told, Microsoft can do great things when motivated to do so. It's just that the main motivation on its end is to protect its turf and to lock customers into their way of doing things. That's how it's consistently been, and it only has ever backed off from that stance in any respect after being hit in the face with it again and again.
It's been said, and with a straight face, that if Microsoft disappeared tomorrow the IT industry would be arguably no worse off for it and probably a good deal better. That said, Microsoft is still profitable, and isn't planning on adopting a business model that would undermine that (read: open source). There are plenty of people who are still willing to pay good money for Microsoft products, despite the lock-in (I confess I'm one such person myself; viz. MS Office), and as long as they continue to do so, Microsoft only has to pretend to play fair.
This is the question as I see it: Should the beast be tamed? Would it be worth the effort to make Microsoft reshape itself into a real force for good? It certainly won't happen from the inside, if it does happen. The only way to get Microsoft to do anything good for the industry as a whole -- or just to keep it from making things worse -- is to keep applying a steady and resolute pressure. It's the only thing that seems to work.
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- How To Regain IT Control In An Increasingly Mobile World - by BlackBerry
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
Featured Broadcast
This white paper explains how to create a manageable, scalable environment suited to answer real-time business needs by building out a data center on a standards-based, virtualization-aware, energy-efficient and affordable platform. Plus, learn how virtualization is making the jump from the server realm into the application, mobile and database worlds in the additional resources section.
Learn More












