Commentary

Joe Hernick
 

CA Surveys 300 IT Execs

Last fall CA hit up IT management at shops earning $250M+ revenue to check the pulse of virtualization. 300 professionals from the U.S., U.K., Germany, Australia and Korea replied. They're sharing the goods.

Last fall CA hit up IT management at shops earning $250M+ revenue to check the pulse of virtualization. Some 300 professionals from the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, and Korea replied. They're sharing the goods.While none of the results struck me as counter-intuitive, the survey seems fairly well executed and offers good insight to non-U.S. markets. CA has made the PowerPoint available here. An additional nice touch is the inclusion of embedded sample data rather than basic JPEG infographics; those who care can dig through more than 30 worksheet tabs to play with the data.

Average number of employees per organization was in the 30K range.


More Storage Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The big news: 88% of U.S. respondents are using some form of virtualization in their company. Adoption stats are lower outside the United States, with 59% in Europe and 46% in the Pacific sample.

In a somewhat curious question, respondents were asked to force-rank the relative importance of virtualizing each of the following areas at your company. Looking at the world-wide pool, servers ranked first and desktops ended up as the least important target for virutalization. Storage, applications, and 'entire data center' rounded out the top four after 'servers'.

When asked for 'success' rankings for their respective companies' virtualization efforts, servers topped the list again, with only 56% claiming 'extremely successful' worldwide. Application grids don't seem to be the poster child for virtualization in the United States; only 15% of domestic respondents gave high rankings to their deployment results.

While security concerns top the survey list of management concerns, U.S. execs are either more confident or more trusting than their foreign peers. Roughly 10% more Euro and Asia/Pacific respondents trump security as a major concern.

Survey data is available on perceived efficacy of VM management tools, utilization rates for physical and virt servers, and one vs. many vendor models. If this data is representative, roughly half the folks out there are currently running more than one flavor of virtualization, and less than half have any concrete long term plans for moving to a one vendor model.

I recommend you take a look if you care about virtualization in the enterprise. Be sure to take a grain of salt, too. Recognize that CA sells VM management tools, and use the data for your own purposes.

This one's going in my 'keeper' file.Last fall CA hit up IT management at shops earning $250M+ revenue to check the pulse of virtualization. 300 professionals from the U.S., U.K., Germany, Australia and Korea replied. They're sharing the goods.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links