Commentary

Eric Ogren
 
See more from this author

Motorola's Viral Mobile World Congress Teaser Ad Misses The Mark

A PR company based in England fired off an e-mail to all us press types attending the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona next week. Embedded in the e-mail is a YouTube link. The video we're treated to is supposed to get us stoked about Motorola's up and coming phones. Instead, it leaves us with the impression that Motorola still thinks it's 2006.

| Eric Ogren | February 04, 2008 12:32 PM

A PR company based in England fired off an e-mail to all us press types attending the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona next week. Embedded in the e-mail is a YouTube link. The video we're treated to is supposed to get us stoked about Motorola's up and coming phones. Instead, it leaves us with the impression that Motorola still thinks it's 2006.You be the judge. Does this video make any sense?


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

In it, a bunch of people are traveling about some European city (most likely London, based on the taxis), while carrying TVs, desktop PCs, monitors, and other electronics gear. Rather than tease us with some glimpse of a new phone, or even a shadow of a new phone, or a gratuitous Fergie shot (Moto's unofficial spokesperson), we just get the Moto logo splashed across the screen. Uh. What? You're not giving us anything to drool over?

The video is titled "It Doesn't Have To Be This Hard." As in, Motorola "gets" that people want to bring their communications tools, entertainment and everything with them wherever they go, and Motorola helps them to do that. Right, OK. Excitement about mobile TV is so 2006. And everyone already has an MP3 player and the Internet in their phones.

What I am "getting" is that maybe that spin-off of Motorola's handset division can't happen fast enough...


, join the conversation

Related Reading

News

More News»

Most Popular

More Popular»

Commentary

More Commentary»

On the Web

More On The Web»

Video

More Videos»

Slideshow

More Slideshows»


Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links