Commentary

Terry Sweeney
 

'Pleased To Put This Matter Behind Us'

As a journalist, it makes me wince to witness reporters getting all sanctimonious when in reality they're doing little more than burnishing their reputations. But the roles got reversed as Hewlett-Packard settled one of two sets of pretexting and spying claims yesterday, acting and speaking with a smugness and neutrality that don't really put the matter behind anyone.

As a journalist, it makes me wince to witness reporters getting all sanctimonious when in reality they're doing little more than burnishing their reputations. But the roles got reversed as Hewlett-Packard settled one of two sets of pretexting and spying claims yesterday, acting and speaking with a smugness and neutrality that don't really put the matter behind anyone.Click here if you need a refresher on the whole shameful affair of how one of the industry's largest IT and storage companies went to extremes to find the source(s) of leaks, which in turn swept through its executive offices like a white tornado. There's little question at this point that what HP did was illegal. If nothing else, fraud and deceit are simply bad behavior. So to watch the company fumble the settlement (and its PR) heaps a bit more fuel on the flame.

Maybe a posture of contrition isn't a corporate article of faith; maybe it was more critical from HP's perspective to admit to no wrong-doing, or maybe as an institution it's had it up to here with the mea culpas.


More Storage Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

In this instance, the two sides have been negotiating since December 2006. The journalists' attorney reported that the resolution was "hard fought." Maybe it was the amount of money (still undisclosed) or how much, if any, of the settlement the aggrieved parties would keep.

"The matter has been resolved to the mutual satisfaction of the parties, and we're pleased to put this matter behind us," an HP spokesperson said in this account, with this needless addendum: "HP also is pleased that the journalists decided to donate all or some portion of the settlement to charity, although HP was not consulted about the charities selected."

HP's going to play the etiquette card now? It's kind of like yelling at a homeless person who fails to consult you on where to spend the dollar you just gave him for dinner.

Clearly, the thinly veiled snideness here masks no small amount of acrimony, whatever the reason or source. In speaking publicly about this settlement, HP had a real chance to behave and speak with some class to restore some of its reputation. Maybe it will drop this tone when it comes times to settle a pending complaint with a second group of journalists. It seems like a small step to start putting this episode behind HP.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links