Commentary

Mitch Wagner
Executive Editor, Community  

Review: Leopard Grows Up With Mac OS X 10.5.2 Update

What's the main improvement in the three-day-old Mac OS X 10.5.2? Increased stability. With previous versions of Leopard, I had to force-quit a frozen application once or twice a day, but with 10.5.2, I haven't had to do it even once. "It just works" is once again a description of the Mac, not just wishful thinking, as it has been since Leopard shipped in October.

What's the main improvement in the three-day-old Mac OS X 10.5.2? Increased stability. With previous versions of Leopard, I had to force-quit a frozen application once or twice a day, but with 10.5.2, I haven't had to do it even once. "It just works" is once again a description of the Mac, not just wishful thinking, as it has been since Leopard shipped in October.TidBITS provides a thoughtful review, saying the update "marks the real beginning of Leopard:"

With their release of 10.5.2, Apple has fixed a number of things that I, other reviewers, and legions of actual users have complained about, and developers and Terminal-level clever folk had come up with reasonable workarounds for that can now be mostly abandoned.

More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The other major upgrade in 10.5.2: Apple changed some menu bar behaviors that many users found annoying. Until now, the Dock and menu bar were translucent, which users who use photos as their desktop wallpaper found confusing. TidBITS explains: "The way I decorate my computer's desktop with my own photographs, the menu bar's transparency rendered it all but illegible, the text in the menu bar being drowned out by the photo colors showing through from behind."

The workaround was a hack that required delving into the Unix operating system that lies at the core of Mac OS X. Now, users can set the menu bar to be fully opaque using a checkbox in the Preferences panel of Mac OSX.

Unfortunately, the Dock is still translucent; if you want to change that, you still have to dive into Unix. TidBITS has instructions.

Apple also made popular changes to the behavior and appearance of folders in the Dock. They act and behave more like folders do elsewhere in Mac OS X, rather than acting and behaving like Stacks, which was a new feature of Leopard. You can still have Stacks, though, if you like Stacks.

I didn't have much of an opinion about the changes in Dock behavior between Tiger and Leopard. However, many people do hate it. A word of advice to Apple: Let go of the translucent dock, it's not buying you any love.

I am enjoying the improved stability of 10.5.2. And it's not just more stable -- the Mac also is faster and more responsive when 10.5.2 is combined with a graphics update that Apple released the same day.

Apple describes dozens of additional changes in the update, which weighed in at about 150 MB for me, 180 MB for the TiDBITS author. The size of the update varies based on your own configuration, but it's pretty big, equivalent to a service pack from Microsoft.

New features include improved reliability and stability of AirPort connectivity, and bug fixes and support for additional devices in Active Directory, Back to my Mac remote access, Dashboard Widgets, iCal, iChat, iSync, Finder, Mail, Networking, Parental Controls, and more.

World of Warcraft players are loving 10.5.2, reporting double frame rates. I've been able to double Second Life performance, too -- but Second Life is still a pig on Leopard; previously, it was running at 1-3 frames per second, now I've got it running at 4-6 FPS. Second Life has got a long way to go until its performance is good; Linden Lab recommends 15+ FPS.

Update Feb. 15: Subsequent to posting this blog, I got a Twitter message from a Second Life friend who says that the performance of the new version of the experimental Windlight client is much better than previous versions on the Mac. She was right: I was running 5-20 FPS in my brief test. Thanks!


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links