Commentary

Serdar Yegulalp
 

SCO Lives! Aarrgh! Rawrr!

The more I watch SCO's progress -- from Unix vendor to patent-wielding lawsuit machine to bankrupt has-been, and now a privately funded corporate reboot -- the more I feel like I'm watching one of those cheesy 1960s Japanese monster movies with a nigh-unkillable creature from outer space.  The super heat ray didn't work on the monster, the mysterious Element X that spews out Radiation Y didn't have any effect either, and now the scientists are falling back on the absolute last resort plan of them all: Awaken Godzilla!  Would that we had Godzilla here, though.

The more I watch SCO's progress -- from Unix vendor to patent-wielding lawsuit machine to bankrupt has-been, and now a privately funded corporate reboot -- the more I feel like I'm watching one of those cheesy 1960s Japanese monster movies with a nigh-unkillable creature from outer space.  The super heat ray didn't work on the monster, the mysterious Element X that spews out Radiation Y didn't have any effect either, and now the scientists are falling back on the absolute last resort plan of them all: Awaken Godzilla!  Would that we had Godzilla here, though.


More Software Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Yes, SCO has lurched to life once more.  The details of SCO's resurrection are still sketchy, but the plan seems plain to anyone who's followed the story so far.  The way I see it, the "tremendous investment opportunity" that SCO's new investors are talking about in their statement is a) to drag out the court battle with Novell and IBM as long as humanly possible, b) score as many wild hits as possible in court to scare people away from Linux and open source, and c) Profit!

I do have to wonder how much SNCP, SCO's new investor, understands about what it's getting into.  The one sentence from the release that hints at a business plan other than suing everything that moves is "SNCP has developed a business plan for SCO that includes unveiling new product lines aimed at global customers", which is as vague as trying to predict the weather a year from Monday.  Do you know of anyone with even a kernel (pun intended) of technical savvy who would have anything to do with SCO at this point, either as an investor, a customer, or an employee?

My hope is that SNCP will pump a bunch of money into SCO, discover that there's no immediate benefit to doing so other than protracted legal struggles and, eventually needing to pay off the $25 million it owes Novell, give up and move on to another boondoggle.  My nightmare, however, is a rejuvenated SCO that manages to continue being an indefinite irritant in the side of open source everywhere.  Having Mothra nesting in the Tokyo Tower seems positively benign in comparison.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links