Commentary

George Hulme
 

Storm Worm Makers Reaping Millions A Day In Profit

That's the scoop from a U.K. PC publication quoting an IBM Internet Security Systems' security expert during a debate at NetEvents Forum in Barcelona.

That's the scoop from a U.K. PC publication quoting an IBM Internet Security Systems' security expert during a debate at NetEvents Forum in Barcelona.Joshua Corman, of IBM Internet Security Systems, is quoted as saying that the 1-year-old "had been a tremendous financial success because it created a botnet of compromised machines that could be used to launch profitable spam attacks," the story says.

It's no doubt a profitable business model, as attackers get paid for sending out the spam, as well as a cut of the profits generated by the spam.


More Security Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

And it seems the spam, and presumably the profits, are not going to stop any time soon. According to this Washington Post blog, both Russian and U.S. government law enforcement agencies are now aware of the worm's authors, and where they reside.

"The right people now know who the Storm worm authors are," said Dmitri Alperovitch, director of intelligence analysis at security firm Secure Computing. "It's incredibly hard because a lot of the FSB leadership and Putin himself originate from there, where there are a great deal of people with connections in high places."

So it looks like we know who the authors are, and they're infecting thousands of systems and raking in millions in illegal profits and there's not much we can do about it.

I'm in the wrong business.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links