The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Backup and Business Continuity Blog

Topics:   Backup and Business Continuity

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Cemaphore MailShadow -- Exchange Failover With A Twist


Posted by Howard Marks, Mar 12, 2008 11:03 PM

E-mail, and more particularly Microsoft Exchange, is a classic example of how user adoption can turn an application mission critical before the IT guys catch on. Most IT departments protect Exchange servers with the same techniques they use to protect other applications. Replicate the data to another disk somewhere and have an idle Exchange server mount the database for failover. Rather than collect data at the file or block level, MailShadow collects Exchange objects at the transaction layer for replication. Working higher on the stack brings MailShadow some significant advantages.


The biggest advantage is not replicating database corruption the way disk replication can, especially as the production server crashes. Replicating transactions also means less data to replicate. Exchange writes every transaction at least twice, once in the transaction log and once in the .EDB file and a disk replicator has to send it each time. Disk replicators use a lot of bandwidth in the middle of the night when Exchange does an online database defragmentation.

Failover is faster than mounting a crash-consistent database since the target Exchange server is always running against it's own database. All MailShadow has to do is a little magic so the client stations will connect to the backup server. Source and target can be running different versions of Exchange. At least one customer has used this feature of MailShadow to migrate to a newer version of Exchange.

« I Smell A Reality Show | Main | Developers: Check Your %*^& Inputs »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  2. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?
  3. Coreinfo v2.0: A Simple Utility to Understand the Manycore Complexity in Windows


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Verizon: $350 ETF Is A Go
  4. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch


  1. Florida Hospital Dials Up iPhones For Nurses
  2. Full Nelson: A Web Presence Needs Sizzle, My Nizzle
  3. Is Antivirus Software Dead?
  4. Practical Analysis: The Fastest-Growing Security Threat
  5. InformationWeek Analytics Research: Federated Search
  6. Securing The Cyber Supply Chain

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007