Commentary

Alexander Wolfe
 

Intel's Atom Processor Won't Solve UMPC Confusion

Call it Silverthorne, call it Atom, but whatever Intel calls it, the company hasn't erased the confusion caused by its desire to popularize a new category of handheld portables variously called Mobile Internet Devices (MIDs) or Ultramobile PCs (UMPCs). The real question is, do consumers want these things? The answer: Mostly, only the early adopters.

Call it Silverthorne, call it Atom, but whatever Intel calls it, the company hasn't erased the confusion caused by its desire to popularize a new category of handheld portables variously called Mobile Internet Devices (MIDs) or Ultramobile PCs (UMPCs). The real question is, do consumers want these things? The answer: Mostly, only the early adopters.Personally, I think it'd be a lot simpler if Intel would publish a decoder chart each time it announces a new chip or brand name. Because I guarantee you, very few folks realize that Atom is the very same processor previously code-named Silverthorne, which Intel talked about in detail in April, 2007, when it discussed its Ultra-Mobile PC vision at its Developer Forum in Beijing.

Still fewer know that Atom/Silverthorne didn't emerge fully formed in a vacuum, but is really a successor to the A100 and A110 processors (aka McCaslin), which appear in a bunch of UMPCs you can actually buy today. These include things like the HTC Shift, which is a smartphone-like device, even though it's a computer, not a phone. (See my post from last month, With HTC Shift, Intel's UMPC Is Finally Real.)


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Therein lies the rub, and the big challenge for Intel. People want PCs. (Mostly, they want laptops, not desktops, which you would think would augur well for ever-lighter handhelds.) Consumers also covet smartphones, in the form of BlackBerrys and iPhones.

But do they want standalone handheld computers, little bitty PCs which they'd carry alongside their smartphone and use to browse the Web? Not so much. Why would they? That's what iPhones are for.

Keep in mind that the iPhone and its ilk are only going to get more powerful. This'll make it an even tougher row to hoe for computing handhelds (UMPCs, mobile Internet devices, whatever you call them).

Hey, I love lightweights like the OQO Model 2, but let's not delude ourselves into thinking that UMPCs are going to become a laptop-displacing category.

Which undoubtedly is not good news for Intel CEO Paul Otellini, who has staked his tenure pushing Intel beyond its narrow reliance on selling PC processors. Intel tried that strategy with communications chips, and ended up selling off the division in 2006 for $600 million. I'm not saying Intel's going to be selling off anything here, but I am saying that UMPCs aren't the fork in the road on the way to the future of computing.

Like this blog? Subscribe to its RSS feed, here.

For a mobile experience, follow my daily observations on Twitter.

Check out my tech videos on this YouTube channel.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links