Powered by InformationWeek Business Technology Network
Topics:
Google
So, Did Google Win Or Lose The Spectrum Auction?
Stifel Nicolaus analyst Blair Levin said Google was the "happy loser" of the spectrum auction, because it forced the open access provisions. Google had this to say about the auction: This afternoon the Federal Communications Commission announced the results of its 700-MHz spectrum auction. While the Commission's anti-collusion rules prevent us from saying much at this point, one thing is clear: although Google didn't pick up any spectrum licenses, the auction produced a major victory for American consumers. So Google feels that American consumers won a major victory? That opinion is not shared by some analysts, who were hoping for a bigger variety of spectrum winners. Instead, the two largest wireless firms in the nation added to their bulk and power. In some respects, this means less choice in the long run for consumers. As reported back before the auction begun, Google never intended to win the spectrum in the first place. There's just no way it was really going to make the investment to build and operate a wireless network on its own. Google is an ad company, not a network company. Running a network would be too far a departure from its core competencies. But by bidding in the auction, Google forced Verizon to shell out the cash necessary to grant open access to devices and applications on portions of the spectrum. Google will be all too happy to provide those devices and applications with its forthcoming Android platform. Google may not have won spectrum, but it won the right to use Verizon's spectrum. In the end, that's all Google probably wanted. « The Google Of Peer To Peer? | Main | George Clooney Googles Himself » |
| Sign Up Now For InformationWeek News Alerts |