Guide to the TechWeb Network


The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Startup City Blog

Topics:   Startup City

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • |  Print this page Print this page
  • |   Bookmark and Share

Chronicle Of A Startup: Microsoft Or Open Source?


Posted by John Foley, Apr 23, 2008 07:14 AM

The biggest choice I face in launching my Web 2.0 site is that of underlying technology platform. So I'm throwing the question open: Should I go with a Microsoft software stack or open source?

I'm truly agnostic on this decision, but I'll say up front that I'm leaning toward Microsoft, mainly because I'm guessing that it will be easier to find qualified programming help. I'm not a technician, and I don't have a budget to hire one. Since the programming work will be outsourced to freelancers, I'm guessing that it will be easier to find Visual Studio/Silverlight programmers than PHP or Ruby on Rails help. But that's merely a hunch; I haven't researched it.

I bounced my idea off Toli Kuznets, co-founder and CTO of Marketcetera, a startup that I recently profiled in InformationWeek. Marketcetera is a commercial open source company, so Toli is obviously biased toward open source. If I were based in San Francisco, this would be a no-brainer -- the vast majority of Bay Area Web startups are working with the open source LAMP stack, he says. In New York, where I live, that's not necessarily true.

Toli had two suggestions: One is to post the job (code-named Project Melville and first described here) on eLancer or a similar site where contractors can bid on it. I could see who nibbles -- VB, PHP, or Ruby programmers -- and at what price. Second, Toli thought it might be worth checking out Google as an alternative platform for building a Web site.

Some of the key characteristics of my unnamed site are that it must be Web 2.0-like in look and feel -- video, a blog, social networking, user-generated content are all part of the plan. It needs to be modular in design and highly interactive. Do those requirements make the choice easier?

Having outsourced some programming work himself, Toli also gave me a more realistic estimate on how much I should be prepared to spend to get the site up and running. While some optimistic advisers suggested that I try to build the site at zero cost, Toli said I should be prepared to spend $5,000 to $10,000 in total on design, programming, integration, and hosting.

So, I'm looking for advice here: Do I build my site using Microsoft software, open source, or some other platform like Sun or Google? Is the lowest-cost approach also the one that will give me the capabilities and flexibility I need?

« Video: Ruby On Rails For Absolute Beginners | Main | Apple To Intel: Atom, Schmatom »



Tomorrow's CIO: Do you have what it takes?
Find out at the 2008 InformationWeek 500 Conference
Sept. 14-16, St. Regis Resort, Monarch Beach, Calif.


Sign up now for the weekly InformationWeek Blog Newsletter.


This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.