Commentary

Terry Sweeney
 

In Lockstep At RSA

Just a few days before the RSA show begins in San Francisco, it's HP and not EMC that's talking loudest about storage and security. Why is that odd? Maybe because EMC owns RSA.

Just a few days before the RSA show begins in San Francisco, it's HP and not EMC that's talking loudest about storage and security. Why is that odd? Maybe because EMC owns RSA.Recall about two years ago when all the major storage vendors went security shopping (or were acquired). Symantec bought Veritas, NetApp got Decru, and EMC scooped up RSA. The age of compliance and data privacy and malicious activity demanded the twinning of storage and security, the vendors said, and analysts and the trade press dutifully repeated it.

I don't think it's any less true. But it makes me wonder why EMC's being so circumspect with regard to RSA, especially after EMC chairman Joe Tucci's cameo at last year's RSA event. I guess you don't mess with a well-known brand name in a market that's as reticent or buttoned-down as security.


More Storage Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

One other interesting addition to this year's RSA agenda: National politicians. Michael Chertoff, the head of the Department of Homeland Security, will deliver a keynote Tuesday and has even deigned to a sit-down with the press afterward. On Friday, Nobel laureate Al Gore grabs the mic, and with any luck, will not talk about how security products can reduce their carbon footprint. These two book-ended speakers remind us it is indeed an election year.

But for the next 72 hours, HP has the security microphone to itself with its new encryption product and key manager. We can expect to hear from IBM, Microsoft, Symantec, and others (probably even EMC) about data protection; compliance and policy enforcement; more secure USB drives; and the like. Two years after the storage=security consolidation, it also will be a good chance to see just how closely linked these two technologies really are.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links