Commentary

Serdar Yegulalp
 

Open Source Census: Stand Up And Be Counted

Just how much open source software are people using?  Getting hard numbers about open source usage is one of those tough-to-crack problems that doesn't seem to have a definitive solution -- partly because of the nature of open source itself.  Self-reporting seems to be about the only way to get any numbers at all, unreliable and biased as that may be.  But if self-reporting open source usage is made as easy as a couple of mouse clicks, why not do it?

Just how much open source software are people using?  Getting hard numbers about open source usage is one of those tough-to-crack problems that doesn't seem to have a definitive solution -- partly because of the nature of open source itself.  Self-reporting seems to be about the only way to get any numbers at all, unreliable and biased as that may be.  But if self-reporting open source usage is made as easy as a couple of mouse clicks, why not do it?


More Software Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

That's at least part of the impetus behind the Open Source Census, a project sponsored by (among others) open source vendor OpenLogic.  The idea is to have users perform scans of their systems and submit data about what open source applications and packages are in use, and complement that with package-fingerprint information submitted by the creators of open source software.  Information sent back to the OSC is anonymized as heavily as possible, to keep down the amount of proprietary information that might be transmitted.  Reports derived from the submitted data will be aggregated and analyzed quarterly.

The project has just barely kicked off, so the statistics collected so far are a little thin.  Many of the usual open-source suspects are present in the census, though -- applications like Firefox and OpenOffice.org, as well as libraries and languages like zlib, OpenSSL, and Perl.  They also collect stats about which Linux distributions are in use, and so far the leader -- is this any surprise? -- is Ubuntu Gutsy, with Red Hat / Fedora, Gentoo, and other Gentoo distributions following behind.

At least part of the pitch for the OSC involves creating tools to make it easier to do internal auditing of open source usage -- like FOSSology, which I've mentioned before -- and "to promote the use of more open source software in the enterprise. We know that if we can show companies how much open source they and their peers are already using, they will feel comfortable using even more."

I'll be running scans of my own systems to see what turns up.  I have the feeling I'll be surprised to find open source in places where I never expected to find it.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links