Commentary

Sprint Delays Xohm To 'Later This Year'

Sprint just doesn't need bad news like this right now. As part of its CTIA participation, a company spokesperson said that it has delayed the launch of its WiMax network from this month to "later." What does this imply?

Sprint just doesn't need bad news like this right now. As part of its CTIA participation, a company spokesperson said that it has delayed the launch of its WiMax network from this month to "later." What does this imply?To be honest, I really expected big WiMax news from Sprint at the CTIA Wireless show here this week in Las Vegas. While Sprint admitted that it is moving forward with its Xohm network, I was looking for a formal launch to kick things off. It didn't happen.

Instead, company spokesperson James Fischer said that the launch has been pushed to later this year, but wasn't any more specific than that. He did say that the reasons weren't technology related, but, "We want to make sure the launch meets our expectations."


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

So far it hasn't met anyone's expectations.

It was originally set to launch in late 2007. The trial markets did get off the ground in December in a very limited way. Sprint then targeted April as the launch date. And given the pre-show chatter I was hearing, it appeared that Sprint was all set to kick WiMax into high hear. In fact, Sprint technology partner Nokia launched a WiMax-equipped version of its Internet tablet this week. Nokia even made it the splashiest press conference at the show, hoisting journalists over 100 feet into the air.

But nothing from Sprint.

We all know about its on-again, off-again relationship with Clearwire. Sprint is likely still trying to forge partnerships with Intel and cable firms to aid in paying for the deployment. If it is waiting to solidify those financial commitments from others before moving forward, I have to wonder what that really says about Sprint's capability to deploy WiMax at all.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links