Commentary

Alexander Wolfe
 

Top Windows Vista Apps: In Praise Of Microsoft Word 2007

Pulling together a list of my favorite Vista apps, I've run into a problem. The piece of software I keep coming back to isn't sexy and doesn't perform any extraordinary technical functions. It's often unheralded and frequently slammed. Yet its user interface is beautifully designed and it's a pleasure to use. If you haven't guessed already, I'm talking about Microsoft Word 2007.

Pulling together a list of my favorite Vista apps, I've run into a problem. The piece of software I keep coming back to isn't sexy and doesn't perform any extraordinary technical functions. It's often unheralded and frequently slammed. Yet its user interface is beautifully designed and it's a pleasure to use. If you haven't guessed already, I'm talking about Microsoft Word 2007.I know, you're thinking that Word is expensive and OpenOffice.org is, well, free. Hey, I'm not saying OpenOffice isn't a great product, especially if you're on a zero-dollar budget. Quite frankly, though, Word 2007 isn't all that expensive if you look around for a good deal. A retail upgrade is less than $100. And, you get a lot of bang for your buck.

As is well known, the sea changes in Word 2007, as compared with prior versions, are The Ribbon and the Office Button. (Not the Seinfeld ribbon.) Those two features are hallmarks of Word's completely revamped -- and, to my mind, greatly improved -- user interface.


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Unfortunately, it's this change for the better that seems to be the big stumbling block for users upgrading from Word 2003. People frequently say to me: "I'm having trouble adjusting to Word's new look and feel." (They really say, "Um, like, you know, I don't, like, know how to use it.") I always tell them the same thing: "Use it for a week, you'll come up the learning curve very quickly. And then you'll love it."

The point here is that Microsoft made a bold move in jettisoning the legacy Word interface and going with a streamlined design. This kind of thinking should be encouraged, not resisted, and the way to do that is to give the app a fair test drive.

A couple of quick caveats: Word 2007 isn't strictly a Vista application. It works just fine under Windows XP, which is how I'm using it now as I type up this post at work. However, the design and release of Office 2007 (of which Word is a key component) were keyed to the launch of Vista in January, 2007. Marketing-wise, Microsoft probably wanted the two to go hand-in-hand, so customers would see Office 2007 as a reason to upgrade to Vista. (Notwithstanding that you don't need to upgrade your operating system to use it. This type of linkage is common marketing practice, though. Remember those execrable adds in the 1990s, when AOL suggested that you needed to be subscriber to gain access to free sites like WebMD?)

Also, I'm a big fan of the entire Office 2007 suite, which adds revamped versions of Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook alongside Word. I use Excel occasionally and like the new version. However, I practically live in Word, and the great user experience I've had for the past year is what's prompting me to write this post.

So what's your experience? Have I failed you as a blogger because I've written something nice about a Microsoft product? Or, like me, do you see the value in hailing a great design from a company that's often been criticized when it delivers an end-user experience that isn't up to snuff?

Resources

What to learn more? The best book I've found on this app is Word 2007: The Missing Manual.

Here's a great O'Reilly screencast, which explains Office's Ribbon.

Like this blog? Subscribe to its RSS feed, here.

For a mobile experience, follow my daily observations on Twitter.

Check out my tech videos on this YouTube channel.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links