Commentary

Richard Martin
 

Under Pressure, Senate Clears Runway For Air Traffic Control Modernization

Breaking up an impasse as bad as rush hour over La Guardia Airport, the U.S. Senate this week is set to pass a reauthorization bill for the Federal Aviation Administration that may finally pave the way for modernizing the nation's antiquated air traffic control system.

Breaking up an impasse as bad as rush hour over La Guardia Airport, the U.S. Senate this week is set to pass a reauthorization bill for the Federal Aviation Administration that may finally pave the way for modernizing the nation's antiquated air traffic control system.Known as NextGen, the upgrade -- which would finally switch controllers from using 1970s-era ground-based radar to modern GPS tracking of aircraft in flight -- has been long delayed by a dispute over how to pay for it. Astonishingly, this isn't a partisan debate: Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller, W. Va., chairman of the Commerce Aviation subcommittee, wanted to slap a $25 "user fee" on general aviation (i.e., noncommercial) flights, while Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, a Democrat from Montana, wanted to up the taxes on noncommercial-grade jet fuel. The big airlines, naturally, were seeking any way to avoid paying for the upgrade themselves.

In the end, under pressure after a series of debacles including safety-inspection issues at Southwest Airlines and thousands of passengers stranded for days after the cancellation of American Airlines flights (again because of inspections), senators agreed to a compromise that will raise the tax on fuel for general aviation planes to 36 cents per gallon from 21.8 cents a gallon.


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

"The deal would provide as much as $290 million in new funding each year for the Airport and Airway Trust Fund to finance the NextGen system," reported Rotor.com, a blog for the helicopter industry.

To say this is overdue is an understatement. The last fully funded FAA reauthorization expired last September. Frustrated by Vietnam War-era computers and lousy working conditions, air traffic controllers are now leaving the field at a rate of six per day. The FAA bill had been on the back burner, but as Aviation Week reported, "The intense public scrutiny FAA is receiving over the aircraft inspection issue has convinced senior Democrats they can't leave the FAA bill sitting on the back burner."

Now maybe the country with the most crowded airways in the world will get air traffic control computers adequate to the task of keeping those airways safe.

"NextGen will provide pilots and ground control crews with identical real-time displays of aircraft positions, enabling pilots to reduce congestion by choosing more efficient routes and separation distances," wrote Barbara S. Peterson in this Popular Mechanics article from last August that is a treat for aviation geeks.

The only holdup to the FAA bill passing the full Senate? Lousy weather across the Eastern Seaboard that could delay air flights and keep senators away from the Capitol.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links