Guide to the TechWeb Network


The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Google

Topics:   Google

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • |  Print this page Print this page
  • |   Bookmark and Share

YouTube Changes Up Policy Enforcement


Posted by Eric Zeman, Apr 18, 2008 11:30 AM

YouTube has modified the way in which it will go after those who post copyrighted material or objectionable videos. Of course, the new rules stirred some outrage among certain users who feel targeted by the "YouTube Police".

The three big changes are called Strikes That Expire, New Notifications, and Muting Accounts. The Official YouTube Blog outlines what the changes entail.

For the Strikes, YouTube staffers said, "It didn't seem fair that a user who uploads three videos that violate the Community Guidelines over the span of a year was being treated the same as someone who uploads those same videos over the course of a week. To change this, we've made it so that violations are now rescinded after six months." YouTube made it clear, however, that any videos that violate copyright claims are exempt from this policy.

The new notification service is meant to circumvent spam filters. "It used to be that if a video was removed for violating the Community Guidelines or due to a claim of copyright infringement, the user would be sent a notice via email," wrote YouTube staffers. "But these notices sometimes get caught by spam filters or go unread. The new system also displays the notice on YouTube the next time they access the site." That sounds fair enough. Basically, they want you to get the message that you're in violation. This is just YouTube trying to cover its back-end a bit.

Lastly, YouTube is trying to be more understand about people who misuse the site. YouTube said, "We are experimenting with ways of correcting some types of abusive behavior that aren't as harsh or as permanent as suspending users. What we've come up with is to temporarily mute users, so that they can still use the site and watch videos, but they can't post new content. Right now it is set up to affect users who have two Community Guidelines warnings in a six-month period and will last two weeks." YouTube didn't detail what it considers to be abusive behavior, though it is assuredly covered in the Terms of Use and Community Guidelines.

Under the post explaining all this is a large number of user comments. There is the predictable flame jobs from people who are upset, but others offer some informative insight.

One poster said, "Fantastic! I've been trying to point out infringing videos to people by just posting a text comment, a non-negative one I assure you, but it's all come back at my face. This would be so nice because now users can get that warning they've been wanting so badly. Only uploading videos that contain 100% your own material (with the exception of material that the person has permission to use) has become such a lost concept. I've seen people joke as if it weren't true. Broadcast Yourself... Not other people's work. How difficult is that to understand?"

Another doesn't agree. "Fine, but this is all sugar coating. Youtube, you suspend people and STILL are not giving them clear reasons, or even a hint of that they supposedly 'violated'. Where do you get off? We understand its your 'site', but the people here are who make your money. Why do you treat your community like that? That's horribly sick. You talk about being 'fair', how about start there."

YouTube, it seems, will never be able to please everyone.

« No Desktop Linux For Red Hat? No Problem | Main | Windows Needs A Good Pruning »



Tomorrow's CIO: Do you have what it takes?
Find out at the 2008 InformationWeek 500 Conference
Sept. 14-16, St. Regis Resort, Monarch Beach, Calif.


Sign up now for the weekly InformationWeek Blog Newsletter.


This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.






  1. Google Chrome: Browser Or Cloud Operating System?
  2. You Thought Vista Was Bad?
  3. Windows Vista: The OS About Nothing
  4. Apple Nixes 'Pull My Finger' App, Even Though It's A Gas
  5. Walt Mossberg Posts In-Depth Review Of Google's Chrome


  1. Microsoft Virtualization Products Due In Thirty Days
  2. Radical Desktops Deliver Power To The People. But What About IT?
  3. Need Disaster Recovery On The Cheap? Think Virtualization
  4. No Virtualizing Without A License
  5. Smart Stuff: The State Of Business Intelligence 2008
  6. Down To Business: Are Technology Leaders Focusing Too Much On The Small Stuff?

 
 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007
AUGUST 2007
JULY 2007
  JUNE 2007
MAY 2007
APRIL 2007
MARCH 2007
FEBRUARY 2007
JANUARY 2007
DECEMBER 2006
NOVEMBER 2006