The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

Backup and Business Continuity Blog

Topics:   Backup and Business Continuity

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Data Domain Adds Retention Enforcement - Deduplication, It's Not Just For Backup Anymore


Posted by Howard Marks, Jun 23, 2008 11:00 PM

In a further attempt to position its deduplicating NAS appliances as general purpose data repositories, Data Domain has added date retention enforcement as an optional feature. This follows naturally from the redesign of the file system last year to support a large number of small files as well as the small number of large files typical of a backup target.


At least in this initial release, Data Domain's solution allows the system administrator to override retention periods, so it's not suitable for Wall Street, pharmaceuticals, and other heavily regulated industries where total immutability is required.

Like several other locked NAS vendors, Data Domain has adopted the mechanism of using the last accessed date field to specify the retention period, an API first used by NetApp's SnapLock option. An application, or user, sets the last access date to the end of a file or folder's retention period and then flips the read-only flag on the file. From that point on, the read-only flag can only be reset by the system administrator before the date specified as last accessed date. Since this API already is in wide use, most archiving applications from Disk Extender and Enterprise Vault to F5 and Attune's file virtualization solutions already support it.

Using a single reduplicating repository for archives and backups should result in lower disk usage, as there will be some data commonality like files that appear in the production file servers and the e-mail archives. This is especially true for a system like Data Domain's that uses variable length blocks and standard data compression rather than context-based deduplication that can be very application specific.

« An ISP Should Carry Bits--And Nothing More | Main | Citect Doesn't Get 'IT' When It Comes To Application Security »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. HPC Joins the Dummy Revolution?
  2. Detecting Scalability Problems With Intel Parallel Universe Portal
  3. Just Say No To SFAQL Parallelism


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. HTC Droid Eris To Get Android 2.0 Update
  2. The Causality Behind Apple's Success
  3. Verizon Calls iPhone A 'Digitally Clueless Beauty Queen'
  4. iPhone Headed For T-Mobile?
  5. Verizon Says Droid Fix Coming In A Few Weeks


  1. Can Electronic Medical Records Be Secured?
  2. Google Chrome OS Previewed
  3. Analytics Brief: 5 Key Steps To Cybersecurity
  4. CIO Profiles: Patti Reilly White, Senior VP And CIO Of Darden Restaurants
  5. The Point-Of-Sale Problem
  6. Air Pressure: Why IT Must Sort Out App Mobilization Challenges

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007