The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Security

Topics:   Security

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Report: RIM Must Hand Over Keys Or Risk Takedown


Posted by George Hulme, Jun 2, 2008 02:54 PM

The Economic Times is reporting that the Indian government's Department of Telecom isn't buying RIM's claim that it can't hand over the encryption keys for its popular BlackBerrys. And that the telecom department is (in the best Don Corleone voice it could muster) giving RIM an ultimatum it can't refuse. While there's no severed horse head, there's more to the story.


According to this report, sources told the Economic Times that the DoT told both RIM and the Canadian High Commission that telcos in India would be asked (read: told) to cease BlackBerry services unless RIM provides a way to monitor communications, or physically moves its servers to India.

According to the story, DoT also told RIM that there would be no more discussions on the issue until RIM devises a solution that would "break the deadlock."

We noted the news last week when RIM told the DoT that it wouldn't provide the encryption keys, as well as the when it became clear that the encryption riff between RIM and the Indian government wasn't going to blow over.

And then just today, TechTree has reported that RIM is feeling somewhat singled out:

Now the company [RIM] is saying that there are at least four other mobile e-mail solutions (Windows Mobile ActiveSync, Nokia Intellisync, Motorola Good, and Seven Networks), using encryption levels comparable to those of BlackBerry, being offered by handset makers including Nokia and Motorola and by software players including Microsoft and Seven Networks.

And that story then asks the obvious:

RIM is now arguing that when there are other solutions using comparable encryption levels, why is it facing the music alone?

Good question. And it means, at first blush, that either Microsoft, Nokia, Motorola, and Seven Networks either already have complied, or they're about to be dancing along with RIM very soon.

« Neil Young's Big Green Electric Hybrid Machine | Main | Juggling Workloads And The Beach »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  2. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?
  3. Coreinfo v2.0: A Simple Utility to Understand the Manycore Complexity in Windows


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch
  4. Sprint And T-Mobile Headed The Wrong Direction


  1. Intel Atom Drives Chip Market In 3Q
  2. Cisco Unveils Collaboration Products
  3. Microsoft Releases Exchange 2010
  4. Global CIO: Cloud Computing's New Name: Who Will Win $100 Million?
  5. Google Computes News Quality
  6. Internet Use Increases Social Connectivity

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007