Commentary

Peter Hagopian
 

Building A Case For Document And Content Management

The July/August issue of AIIM E-DOC Magazine features an interesting document and content management case study by John Harney this month titled "Making a Case for Content Management." The return on investment in the case study is stunning -- a government agency was able to save nearly half a million dollars in taxpayer funds a year by going from a manual to an automated system.

The July/August issue of AIIM E-DOC Magazine features an interesting document and content management case study by John Harney this month titled "Making a Case for Content Management." The return on investment in the case study is stunning -- a government agency was able to save nearly half a million dollars in taxpayer funds a year by going from a manual to an automated system.The case study takes a look at the City Attorney's Office in Torrance, Calif. In 2000, the office was buried under paperwork and was under regulatory pressure to reduce the time each case took to go to trial from an average of 5 years to less than one year. It also was outsourcing almost 75% of its legal work, due to the staff working on other manual, paperwork-heavy tasks.

Faced with these and other issues, it decided to work with a Value Added Reseller (VAR) to find a solution to move from traditional paper-based document and content management to an automated electronic system. Working on the project from 2000-2002, the VAR was able to create a solution powered by eCopy, Rainmaker, and Interwoven, with a total cost of approximately $100,000.


More Business Intelligence Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

That's not cheap, but the City Attorney's Office was able to immediately started recouping the costs. It saved more than $240,000 in salaries each year by reducing its administrative staff by four and also was able to bring more of the day-to-day legal work back in-house, resulting in additional savings of more than $200,000 a year. Add to that savings on off-site storage and cabinets (less people and paper mean less space), and the total annual savings quickly approaches $500,000.

The article goes into a lot of additional details on the solution, and is certainly a worthy read for a law office or other organization considering the benefits of investing in a document and content management system. A few other pieces in the magazine this month may be of interest to the content management community, and the digital edition of the July/August issue of AIIM E-DOC Magazine can be found at www.edocmagazine.com. You'll need to create a free account to view the content, but once you have one, you can download the issue as a PDF.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links