Commentary

Alexander Wolfe
 

Facebook Facelift Doesn't Answer Social Net's Big Question

Facebook, that personal scrapbook you get to fill out on company time -- I'm joking; it's really a valuable business tool -- just got a facelift. Personally, I was impressed at its cleaner-looking home page, until my teenage daughter took one look at it and said: "Oh, they made it look more like MySpace."

Facebook, that personal scrapbook you get to fill out on company time -- I'm joking; it's really a valuable business tool -- just got a facelift. Personally, I was impressed at its cleaner-looking home page, until my teenage daughter took one look at it and said: "Oh, they made it look more like MySpace."The new design is being pushed wide today, but if you can't see it yet, go explicitly to new.facebook.com. Also, you can see the screen grab, below. (And hey, if you wanna "friend" me, and I know who you are by no more than six times removed, what the heck.)

Seriously, though, the fact that this "friend" come-on could just as easily be serious (it's a joke!) points up the lingering problem with the big social-networking sites. Which is that Facebook and LinkedIn really don't have much quantifiable value. Mostly there's the vague promise -- particularly with LinkedIn -- that someone out in the Web ether might recruit you for a hot new job. (Or, friends will start pinging you if they're "looking but not looking.")


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

SmallBizResource.com blogger Gayle Kesten astutely puts her finger on it by noting the sense that social networking is "part of this incredible Internet evolution that, even if not completely understood, should be embraced."

That's the way I feel, though perhaps to the Nth degree, in that early adoption is often its own reward. I've been a Facebook developer for some time now. Mostly, I've done simple apps which make RSS feeds accessible as Facebook-friendly lists of headlines and blurbs. (I'm hoping to build more ambitious apps, the only stumbling block being I need to figure out what people would actually like to look at on FB.)

I've also embraced Joomla as the next-generation in site-building tools, and have been playing around with it on my personal Web site.

I can't conclude a post about social nets without mentioning the one that's the lightest weight but the most fun. Of course, I'm talking about Twitter. Here, the debate is: What's the correct way to approach micro-blogging?

I'm not a fan of the let-it-all-hang-out approach popular among many Twitters.(As Kesten aptly put it: "Do I need to know someone I'm following just ate a turkey sandwich?")

Me, I try to confine my "tweets" (a term which makes it hard to explain this stuff to family members, or normal people anywhere) to tech-related nuggets, complaints about Starbucks (bring back the bold!), and shout-outs about my favorite new CDs.

Here's the final Zen paradox on all this stuff. Social networking may be pervasive and it may be lightweight. But, just like the way the planets were formed, the Facebooks of the online universe are getting denser by the day. Eventually, they'll suck everyone else in and take over. Which is why I'm signing off now to go do some more development.



The redesigned Facebook page. (Click picture to enlarge.)

Here are my Facebook apps:

InformationWeek Blog Update; InformationWeek News Update; bMighty BizTech Update; and bMighty Blog Update.

What's your take. Please leave your comments below or e-mail them to me directly at alex@alexwolfe.net.


Like this blog? Subscribe to its RSS feed, here.

For a mobile experience, follow my daily observations on Twitter.

Check out my tech videos on this YouTube channel.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links