Commentary

Thomas Claburn
 

Google + Digg?

Google is about to acquire Digg, or so says Michael Arrington of TechCrunch.

Google is about to acquire Digg, or so says Michael Arrington of TechCrunch.Google isn't saying. "We do not comment on market rumor or speculation," a Google spokesperson said via e-mail.

Given that Google owns Digg.ru, it seems safe to say that Google's spokespeople aren't saying as much as they could. And this isn't the first time talk of a union between Digg and Google has surfaced.


More Internet Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The deal, if real, is baffling, though.

For $200 million less than the $200 million Google is supposedly prepared to offer, Google could install Pligg, open-source software that allows users to build Web sites with Digg-style voting. Add a few Google engineers to make Pligg scale and Google saves a nice chunk of change.

So the deal is about buying the Digg community rather than Digg's technology.

The question is what Google would do with Digg? It might just leave Digg as a standalone property, like YouTube. Certainly, Digg drives a lot of traffic and Google never has enough of that.

The Google property that's most closely related to Digg is Google News. As I see it, Digg and Google News go together like oil and water. It's already odd enough that a select group of people are allowed to comment on Google News while others aren't. I hope Google News continues to rely on an algorithm rather than user votes.

A more interesting scenario would be integrating Digg with iGoogle. There's already a Digg widget for iGoogle and Google might, by acquiring Digg, be able to make social interaction and personalization more unified. There's certainly more that could be done to make Google Accounts resemble social network profiles.

Personally, I'd like to see Diebold buy Digg and then start skewing users' votes.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links