The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Google

Topics:   Google

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Google's Patents At Risk?


Posted by Thomas Claburn, Jul 22, 2008 07:36 PM

A provocatively titled post at the Patently-O blog, The Death of Google's Patents, by John F. Duffy, suggests that the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office's narrowing view of patentable innovation may invalidate some of Google's patents, not to mention patents held by IBM, Microsoft, and other companies with software patents.


Duffy argues that under the PTO's new rules, Google will lose its famous PageRank patent. And he claims this will harm innovation throughout the technology industry.

"The apparent death of Google's pioneering PageRank patent under the PTO's new rule for patentable subject matter may be a cause for celebration among those who are philosophically opposed to property rights in innovation and are eager to confine the patent system's ambit," Duffy writes. "It will surely be cause for mourning among those who believe that allowing patents on cutting-edge technologies has served the country well for more than two centuries and that a radical departure from the traditional approach would be unwise."

Setting aside claims by Techdirt's Mike Masnik that Duffy has an undisclosed bias as the author of an amicus brief that argues in support of software patents -- Dennis Crouch, the law professor who maintains Patently-O, said in an e-mail that Duffy's views and history have been disclosed in previous posts and aren't issues of concern -- Duffy's worries about the death of Google's patents are overblown.

Google tends to be the defendant in patent cases. If software patents become less common or disappear, Google will probably spend less time in court and less money on attorney's fees. And as CEO Eric Schmidt suggested on the company’s recent earnings conference call, Google's legal fees are not insubstantial these days.

Google's technological lead these days isn't so much a matter of PageRank as it is the company's combination of PageRank and hundreds of other factors that go into its search and advertising algorithms. It's also the company's technical infrastructure and ad client base, the company's developer community, and its engineers. It's much more than a few patents.

As for Duffy's contention that the demise of software patents will harm innovation, just look at the creative ferment in the open source community, which seems to get along fine without patents. Indeed, Google's decision last year to join the Open Invention Network, which helps protect open-source developers from patent claims, shows that the company isn't betting its future on patents.

« Virgin Mobile Axes Stripping Campaign | Main | What's Behind Apple's MobileMe Meltdown »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
Sign Up For The Grok on Google Newsletter
Every Thursday, Tom Claburn and his fellow analysts offer all the news, insight, analysis, and strategic thinking you need to understand the company and complex phenomenon known as Google.

Sign up for our free, weekly newsletter today!

Newsletter Archives


  :: THE LATEST GOOGLE NEWS ::



 

  1. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  2. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?
  3. Coreinfo v2.0: A Simple Utility to Understand the Manycore Complexity in Windows


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Verizon: $350 ETF Is A Go
  4. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch


  1. Florida Hospital Dials Up iPhones For Nurses
  2. Full Nelson: A Web Presence Needs Sizzle, My Nizzle
  3. Is Antivirus Software Dead?
  4. Practical Analysis: The Fastest-Growing Security Threat
  5. InformationWeek Analytics Research: Federated Search
  6. Securing The Cyber Supply Chain

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007