The InformationWeek -- Blogs

Backup and Business Continuity Blog

Topics:   Backup and Business Continuity

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

If Tape Is Dead, Why Did IBM And Sun Put 1 TB On A Cartridge?


Posted by Howard Marks, Jul 15, 2008 08:29 PM

Every once in awhile a vendor, or a fellow member of the brotherhood of storage industry bloggers, pundits, and blowhards, pronounces that disk-to-disk backup, data deduplication, the virtual tape library, or some other disk-based technology spells the death knell for tape in the data center. While I wouldn't go so far as Adam Osborne and claim that the tape-less data center is as likely as the paperless bathroom, I don't see tape disappearing altogether for a good little while. Apparently, Sun and IBM agree with me, as both announced new versions of their high-end tape drives that can store 1 TB of uncompressed data on a single cartridge.


While many organizations use LTO, and even SDLT, drives for Windows and open systems backup, the big boys with petabytes to backup use Sun StorageTek T10000 and IBM 3592 tape drives because, as John Cameron Swayze would say, "They take a licking and keep on ticking," running 7 by 24 by 365.

Sun's T10000B, announced Monday and therefore with bragging rights about being first, packs 1 TB on the same tape as the previous generation T10000A and boosts throughput to 120 MB/s. IBM's TS1130, just 24 hours behind, also crams 1 TB on an existing tape cartridge, but has the performance bragging rights at 160 MB/s.

Few customers buy just one, but a T10000B would set you back $37,000 and a TS1130 $39,500; current TS1120 users can upgrade for the bargain price of $19,500.

While disk has cut into tape's traditional cost per bit advantage, it's hard to beat the long-term stability of tapes on the shelf and they don't use any power till you retrieve their data.

« Ads Come To Boarding Passes | Main | Target's Swipe At Privacy, An Update »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Detecting Scalability Problems With Intel Parallel Universe Portal
  2. Just Say No To SFAQL Parallelism
  3. QuickThread: A New C++ Multicore Library


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon All Offering Black Friday Sales
  2. HP Picks Worst Name Ever For New Smartphone
  3. Apple Says Users To Blame For iPhone Virus
  4. Best Buy Rolls Out $99 Android Sale
  5. Google's New Chrome OS Partner: Ubuntu


  1. Apple Accepts PhoneGap For iPhone Development
  2. Apple Seeks Permanent Halt To Psystar Mac Clones
  3. NIST Director Sees Key Role In Emerging Technologies
  4. Sprint Gets Nod To Buy iPCS
  5. FCC Chair Wants More Broadband
  6. Gartner: Data Center Problems Ahead

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007