Commentary

Dave Methvin
 

Microsoft Needs Its Mojo Back

Somewhere in the Silicon Valley, there's a Doctor Evil holding a test tube full of Microsoft Mojo. Unlike the golden age of the 1990s, Microsoft isn't generating excitement anymore. Sure, people still care what Microsoft does, but lately it's more like the industry knows the company is headed for a fall and is just rubbernecking to see the inevitable result.

Somewhere in the Silicon Valley, there's a Doctor Evil holding a test tube full of Microsoft Mojo. Unlike the golden age of the 1990s, Microsoft isn't generating excitement anymore. Sure, people still care what Microsoft does, but lately it's more like the industry knows the company is headed for a fall and is just rubbernecking to see the inevitable result.Problems are arriving on all fronts. Vista uptake in the enterprise just isn't happening; it's likely that many Vista licenses sold there are being downgraded to XP. Microsoft's plan to combine search forces with Yahoo hardly matters; at this point the both of them are plummeting against Google, which has nearly 70% share. The Zune music player is a minor nuisance to Apple's iPod. Sony just announced price cuts that are likely to push Microsoft into another round of XBox cuts, just as they were starting to eke out a profit. (Microsoft has lost about $7 billion on XBox since 2002.)

I'm not saying that Vista, Zune, XBox, or Live Search are bad products or outright failures, but they're not great successes, either. Certainly not when judged by Microsoft's historical triumphs with Windows 95/98 and the Microsoft Office franchise. It's hard to recall the kind of buzz that was generated by Windows 95 more than a decade ago. People waited in line outside stores, which opened at the stroke of midnight so people could get their hands on a copy. Is there any product released by Microsoft in the past 5 years that anyone would wait in line to get?


More Windows Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

There are plenty of products that still generate that kind of buzz today, but they aren't from Microsoft. For example, Apple can have a "disastrous" IPhone 2.0 rollout with long lines and activation delays, yet former Microsoft blogger Robert Scoble fawns over it. While Sony and Microsoft slug it out on price in the game console market, Nintendo out-buzzes them both with the Wii. Despite some flaws in these products, they have an incredible amount of excitement around them.

So how can Microsoft pull out of its funk? The company needs some innovative and elegant products or technologies that generate buzz. One of Microsoft's advantages for these past 25 years, the ecosystem of third-party hardware and software vendors, is now holding the company back. The Windows ecosystem is what it is and Microsoft can't change that now, so it needs to get the OEMs and ISVs involved. Microsoft needs to do whatever it takes to convince those partners that Microsoft's success means their success. For OEMs, that means no bundling crapware and always offering quality driver support. For ISVs, it means software should work well as non-privileged applications and not require administrative privileges for everything.

It's not just a case of Microsoft's marketing machine dropping a load of dollars to improve the company's image. It can spend all it wants, but it won't change people's perceptions unless the products deliver as well. That's why Microsoft's new Vista marketing push is most likely a waste of money. Most consumers and companies have their Vista opinions set after experiencing the OS for 18 months; it would be better for Microsoft to get Windows 7 done -- and this time, make sure the OEMs and ISVs can really support it from day one.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links