Commentary

Dave Methvin
 

Powerset Grab Shows Microsoft's Commitment To Search

After Microsoft's on-again-off-again-maybe-not-done-yet bid for Yahoo or some part thereof, its acquisition of Powerset shows that it want to be a serious player in search. Better search results might drive users to Live Search, or at least keep them from leaving when the results aren't so hot. Yet there's still a lot more Microsoft needs to do.

After Microsoft's on-again-off-again-maybe-not-done-yet bid for Yahoo or some part thereof, its acquisition of Powerset shows that it want to be a serious player in search. Better search results might drive users to Live Search, or at least keep them from leaving when the results aren't so hot. Yet there's still a lot more Microsoft needs to do.Powerset's claim to fame is the use of "semantic search" techniques. Put simply, semantic search improves search quality by techniques such as inferring meaning from sentence structure, using word synonyms, and determining the specific meaning of words from their context. A user searching for "trees" in a gardening context, for example, does not want to find an article about binary trees in a programming context. But how much do these techniques really improve search results?

I mention trees because Microsoft's announcement says, "Search engines don't understand today that 'shrub' and 'tree' are similar concepts." When I do a Google search for "transplanting large shrub," the results seem to cover both trees and shrubs pretty well. That doesn't have to be because Google applies a complex algorithm to find synonyms for "shrub," but simply because most substantial articles about transplanting large shrubs will also apply to trees. The first page has what appear to be several good hits.


More Windows Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Then there are Microsoft's search-related problems that have yet to be solved, even with better search technology. Somehow, Microsoft needs to reach and switch users who are comfy with their Google and Yahoo habits. The Live Search Cashback plan of paying users directly works with product purchases, where money is already changing hands. I wouldn't be surprised to see Microsoft come up with some sort of similar program for organic search, although the incentives might be harder to come by.

Somehow Microsoft has to monetize this search traffic, and that was one of the attractions of a Yahoo deal. Could Microsoft build its own search ad system? Yes, but it may involve a long and unprofitable learning curve. Don't forget that Yahoo's capabilities are not homegrown; it bought Overture to make the leap into search ads. I have to think that Microsoft is still on the prowl for help with this angle, but the pickings are slim.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links