The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Storage Blog

Topics:   Storage

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Vibrations Part II


Posted by George Crump, Jul 25, 2008 12:23 PM

In my last entry we opened up a can of worms around drive vibration, discussing what it is and how it occurs. Vibration exists, but why should you, the IT professional, care? This stuff is all on RAID 5, right? Why do you care if a drive fails?


As I said in the previous entry, up to 70% of drives that are returned to the drive manufacturers are fine. Many can be powered back on and, with no additional effort, pass all diagnostic tests. In short, it was a false failure. Many of the remaining "failed" drives can simply be reconditioned by recalibrating the heads, rewriting the servo tracks and performing a low-level format of the drive. This will allow them to pass all diagnostics.

What do these false failures or recoverable failures cost you? Time and possibly data. You have to pull the drive, put a new drive in, rebuild the RAID setup, pack up the drive, and either give it to the supplier's engineer or send it back to the manufacturer. It's an annoyance and just takes time away from IT professionals who are already stretched too thin as it is. Especially when all this time is spent for something that in 70% of the instances should have never occurred in the first place!

Back to vibration. What are the effects of vibration?

First, it causes heads to move horizontally off track or to vertically fly too high or too low. This results in read and write errors, which then cause excessive retires, slowing data access, and can even lead to data loss because the outbound data is unreadable or the inbound data unwriteable.

This vibration can then cause early drive failure because of excessive read and write errors. In truth, the problem may not be with that drive at all. One of the adjacent drives in a drive bay may actually be creating enough vibration to cause failures in neighboring drives. Ever have a drive slot that seems to have recurring failures? It may not be that bay or that slot, it may be the adjacent drive.

The bigger fear is that the drive with excessive vibration does not fail right away and causes the two adjacent drives on each side to fail, thereby causing a complete RAID failure but a golden opportunity to test how well your backup is working.

I have even seen a case where this problem has caused a triple drive failure, breaking even a RAID 6 protection scheme. Drive 4 was overvibrating, drive 3 failed, during the rebuild drive 5 failed, and then, as you might have guessed, drive 4 failed. Ironically, all three drives, when sent back to the manufacturer, were perfectly fine.

Most array companies are not doing much to solve vibration issues, assuming that it's easier to just replace the falsely failed units than have to redesign their architectures. A few companies seem to be out in front on this issue. In our third entry on the subject, we will cover some techniques that companies like Xiotech and Copan Systems are using to reduce drive vibration in their specific environments.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

« Revisiting Click-to-Call | Main | Gmail Adds Easy Email Encryption »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Visual Studio 2010 Multi-Monitor Support Helps Debugging Parallel Code
  2. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  3. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch
  4. Sprint And T-Mobile Headed The Wrong Direction


  1. Apple Releases Snow Leopard Security Patch
  2. 9 In 10 Web Apps Have Serious Flaws
  3. Agency For International Development Outsources To CSC
  4. Health IT Career Tips
  5. RIM, Adobe Team For BlackBerry Development
  6. Hadoop Crunches Web-Sized Data

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007