Commentary

Google: You Have No Privacy, Part 2

Google is taking more heat for alleged privacy violations stemming from its Street Views service, this time in Sonoma County, Calif. In this instance, a Google Street Views driver went through a gate, past a "No Trespassing" sign, and past a watchdog to take his images. Think your private road is going to stop Google's prying eyes? Think again.

Google is taking more heat for alleged privacy violations stemming from its Street Views service, this time in Sonoma County, Calif. In this instance, a Google Street Views driver went through a gate, past a "No Trespassing" sign, and past a watchdog to take his images. Think your private road is going to stop Google's prying eyes? Think again.Betty Webb, a resident in Humboldt County, Calif., isn't a happy camper. According to her, a Google Street Views driver went up her private road and past two "No Trespassing" signs to take pictures of her house, which is 1,200 feet back from the main street. "It isn't just a privacy issue; it is a trespassing issue, with their own photos as evidence. They really went off the track to get to our address," she told The Press Democrat via e-mail.

The Press Democrat goes on to report that, "On Orr Ranch Road, a private street outside of Santa Rosa, Google drove its car past a 'Private Road' sign and continued photographing for nearly a mile. Near Freestone, the company drove past a 'No Trespassing' sign and through a gate to take photographs from a dirt road that passed through someone's yard. The images allowed Internet users to see inside someone's living room window."


More Internet Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Hmm. Allowing anyone on the Internet to see into my living room? I think that would tick me off. I live in an urban environment. My neighbors' houses are scant feet from my own. In such an environment, I expect to give up a small portion of privacy, but I still don't expect anyone to be staring -- or have a view -- into my living room.

Google contends that its policy prohibits drivers from driving up private land, but the message isn't getting through. One driver said quite bluntly that he was simply told to drive around Sonoma County and take pictures.

Google also says that it has the right to go up private roads. In legal filings, it said, "turning around in a private driveway while photographing the exterior of a home is not a substantial intrusion."

I expect that point can and will be debated hotly. There is a most likely a reason that Ms. Webb lives 1,200 feet down a private road. She wants to have some privacy. For Google to drive one-quarter mile up her private road and snatch pictures of her house seems like an intrusion to me.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links