Commentary
Google: You Have No Privacy, Part 2
Google is taking more heat for alleged privacy violations stemming from its Street Views service, this time in Sonoma County, Calif. In this instance, a Google Street Views driver went through a gate, past a "No Trespassing" sign, and past a watchdog to take his images. Think your private road is going to stop Google's prying eyes? Think again.Google is taking more heat for alleged privacy violations stemming from its Street Views service, this time in Sonoma County, Calif. In this instance, a Google Street Views driver went through a gate, past a "No Trespassing" sign, and past a watchdog to take his images. Think your private road is going to stop Google's prying eyes? Think again.Betty Webb, a resident in Humboldt County, Calif., isn't a happy camper. According to her, a Google Street Views driver went up her private road and past two "No Trespassing" signs to take pictures of her house, which is 1,200 feet back from the main street. "It isn't just a privacy issue; it is a trespassing issue, with their own photos as evidence. They really went off the track to get to our address," she told The Press Democrat via e-mail.
The Press Democrat goes on to report that, "On Orr Ranch Road, a private street outside of Santa Rosa, Google drove its car past a 'Private Road' sign and continued photographing for nearly a mile. Near Freestone, the company drove past a 'No Trespassing' sign and through a gate to take photographs from a dirt road that passed through someone's yard. The images allowed Internet users to see inside someone's living room window."
More Internet Insights
White Papers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
Reports
- How Google+, Facebook Impact Corporate Strategy: Social Media and IT at a Crossroads
- IT Pro Impact: NFC and Mobile Commerce
Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- Outsourcing Security: What Every Potential Cloud Security Customer Should Know
Hmm. Allowing anyone on the Internet to see into my living room? I think that would tick me off. I live in an urban environment. My neighbors' houses are scant feet from my own. In such an environment, I expect to give up a small portion of privacy, but I still don't expect anyone to be staring -- or have a view -- into my living room.
Google contends that its policy prohibits drivers from driving up private land, but the message isn't getting through. One driver said quite bluntly that he was simply told to drive around Sonoma County and take pictures.
Google also says that it has the right to go up private roads. In legal filings, it said, "turning around in a private driveway while photographing the exterior of a home is not a substantial intrusion."
I expect that point can and will be debated hotly. There is a most likely a reason that Ms. Webb lives 1,200 feet down a private road. She wants to have some privacy. For Google to drive one-quarter mile up her private road and snatch pictures of her house seems like an intrusion to me.
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- How To Regain IT Control In An Increasingly Mobile World - by BlackBerry
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Featured Resource
Download this whitepaper and find out how to easily manage web content by categorizing it into a discrete number of categories.
Learn More












