The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Storage Blog

Topics:   Storage

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Migration Migraines


Posted by George Crump, Aug 22, 2008 09:45 AM

Moving data between tiers of storage has gotten easier as a result of global file systems and simplified archive software, but upgrading to a new platform ... that is just plain ugly.


When it is time to look at a new storage system for primary storage one of the top considerations is moving data to the new platform. As you can imagine, the more data there is the harder it is to move. This is not as simple as a copy and paste, which is not only the slowest possible method but also can play havoc on file security settings. This data has to be moved in such a way as to preserve file security attributes while at the same time optimizing performance. What are your options?

First, you can opt not to switch manufacturers at all. Many suppliers have the ability to do “data in place” upgrades between platforms. You simply connect the old storage shelves to the new storage controllers and start accessing data. Be careful, though. All is not as it would seem. Sometimes this transfer requires a maintenance window where applications need to be down. Also in some cases the older storage cannot benefit from the performance and enhancements the newer controllers may offer.

The big challenge, however, is that the shelf may not go all the way up the manufacturers product family. So, for example, if you purchase a midrange system and at some point need an enterprise system you may not be able to take your data with you … not by merely plugging it in, anyway.

If you do want to switch suppliers to get better performance, storage management capabilities, or price point, then you need to look at some sort of migration tool. A few manufacturers have the ability to support other manufacturer's storage and can absorb them into their environment. You need to be watchful here, too. First, you need to make sure how that absorption will work. In some cases, it may mean that the storage will be supported but the data needs to be reloaded. In others, it may mean that it can be supported and managed but none of the new software capabilities can be taken advantage of.

In many cases, if you are switching platforms you need to get a separate tool just to do the migration. Most of the storage manufacturers have either a specific tool or a professional service offering to help you with the migration. Negotiate this up front, these can be expensive “oopses” to miss. Other manufacturers like Incipient have optimized their storage management application to offer a subset of it that just does migration.

Part of the solution is to keep primary storage as small as possible -- yes, here I go on about archiving again. In the next entry, we will look at how archive can help with migration and how archives themselves need to handle migrations.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss.

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

« Getting The Information Out | Main | Google Offers Up Gears Geolocation API To Make Web Sites Location Aware »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  2. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?
  3. Coreinfo v2.0: A Simple Utility to Understand the Manycore Complexity in Windows


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch
  4. Sprint And T-Mobile Headed The Wrong Direction


  1. 9 In 10 Web Apps Have Serious Flaws
  2. Agency For International Development Outsources To CSC
  3. Health IT Career Tips
  4. RIM, Adobe Team For BlackBerry Development
  5. Hadoop Crunches Web-Sized Data
  6. Microsoft Acquires SourceGear's Teamprise Unit

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007