Commentary

Fredric Paul
 

Social Factors -- Not Technology -- Limit Videoconferencing

Despite dramatic improvements in quality and affordability and spiraling cost of business travel, most companies still don't use videoconferencing. That's because even the most significant technological improvements can't address the powerful emotional and psychological factors that make many people uncomfortable with videoconferencing.

Despite dramatic improvements in quality and affordability and spiraling cost of business travel, most companies still don't use videoconferencing. That's because even the most significant technological improvements can't address the powerful emotional and psychological factors that make many people uncomfortable with videoconferencing.In researching a new story for bMighty.com (InformationWeek's sister site for small and midsize companies) called Why You Aren't Using Videoconferencing, I came across this bias in many forms -- even from videoconferencing veterans and vendors -- and experienced it myself. There's even a hilarious YouTube video that exposes one potential pitfall (click here to see it embedded in the bMighty story.)

Bottom line: people are uncomfortable on camera. They don't know how to behave, so they tend to shy away from meeting via videoconference for fear of embarrassing themselves.


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Better, more lifelike, technology can help, but even the best telepresence systems don't change the fact that people act differently in a videoconference than they do in a face-to-face meeting. Videoconferencing vendors ranging from Cisco to Siemens recognize this issue, but few are doing much about it.

The hope seems to be that as people get used to it, they'll get over it. Many proponents claim that once people start using a videoconferencing system, they forget they're not in a live meeting.

Maybe so, but others say videoconferencing users remain more conscious of their own and others' appearance, more aware of body language, and less forgiving of mistakes than are participants in live meetings.

As gasoline nears $5 per gallon and air travel becomes an expensive ordeal -- all while spewing untold tons of hydrocarbons into the atmosphere -- many people look to videoconferencing to save money and save the planet. But no matter how much money it saves and how green it is, videoconferencing won't be a viable replacement for most folks until we figure out the basic social conventions around using it properly.

Here's hoping that videoconferencing vendors learn to take that as seriously as they do adding HD video and allowing their systems interconnect with each other.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links