Commentary

About That Delay Of Windows Mobile 7...

Earlier this week a CNet story sparked furor over a supposed delay of the Windows Mobile 7 operating system. It was ostensibly pushed back from January 2009 to June 2009. Microsoft didn't clarify anything in its response to the story.

Earlier this week a CNet story sparked furor over a supposed delay of the Windows Mobile 7 operating system. It was ostensibly pushed back from January 2009 to June 2009. Microsoft didn't clarify anything in its response to the story.This is classic business schadenfreude at work. On Tuesday, CNet reported, "partners who had expected to have a final release [of Windows Mobile 7] in their hands by early next year have been told now that it won't be ready until the second half of next year." In other words, handset manufacturers who are likely to build WinMo7 smartphones thought they were getting it in January, and now they're not getting it until June the earliest.

The only details we really have about Windows Mobile 7 were spilled by a Microsoft employee in January of this year. That person risked a lot by publishing an epic tome of documents about the new version of Windows Mobile 7. Those documents noted that WinMo7 would be in a final form by late 2008 or early 2009. This coincides with what Microsoft's partners had been told.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Microsoft, for its part, has said very little about the next generation of Windows Mobile. The only public statement we know of came from Steve Ballmer, who said, "The work we're doing on Windows Mobile 7, which is the next major release of Windows Mobile, not just in the Windows Mobile team, but across Windows Mobile, in Silverlight, the development platform, the e-mail, the back-end, I think you'll continue to see that as an area of major excitement and innovation for the company as we move forward."

That's is. That's all we have from Microsoft.

When this week's story broke, PC Magazine went straight to Microsoft about the matter, and even posted the article to Mobius' discussion boards. (Mobius is an invitation-only community with roughly 100+ members now of the world's most influential technology pundits and online writers/bloggers). The negative backlash from Mobius was immediate.

What's more interesting is the response PC Magazine received from Microsoft. Sascha Segan wrote, "I asked Microsoft group product manager Scott Rockfeld about the issue and he responded by denying the product exists. Not just saying that there's no due date, which would be perfectly understandable. He tried to avoid acknowledging the existence of a so-called Windows Mobile 7 entirely."

Mr. Rockfeld and Mr. Ballmer obviously don't talk to one another, or Mr. Rockfeld doesn't check to see what the CEO of his company might be saying about unannounced products.

Rockfeld went on to say that Microsoft never "announced anything about any future versions of our OS, nor have we said anything about timing."

The truth of the matter is, Microsoft needs to do something with its mobile platform, and it needs to do it soon. June 2009 won't be soon enough.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links