The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

Information Management Blog

Topics:   Information Management

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Are PST Files A Problem?


Posted by Andrew Conry-Murray, Sep 8, 2008 11:19 AM

InformationWeek readers know their users store e-mail on local drives, but aren't sure if they approve.


Sixty percent of respondents to an InformationWeek survey on e-mail archiving say their users store .pst files on their own computers and removable drives. Outlook allows users to save messages, calendar entries, tasks, and other information in a personal folder on the local machine called PST. From there, these files can be moved to shared drives and removable media.

Users like PST files because they can read stored messages when they aren't connected to Exchange, and because they can have local copies of messages with important business information.

However, only 34% of respondents expressly allow PST files, while 31% don't have a policy. (In case you're wondering, 864 business technology professionals responded to this survey.)

Why should you care? If you guessed electronic discovery and compliance, you've been paying attention to this Information Management blog. PST files are a risk. For one, if your organization has retention/disposition policies in place, PST files let users get around those polices. Locally stored messages also may contain sensitive data that could lead to a breach if a user's laptop is lost or stolen.

PST files also complicate electronic discovery efforts. Discovery activity may overlook potentially relevant messages buried on a user's hard drive or flash drive. Users may delete incriminating messages -- activity the courts frown on.

Are PST files on your radar? Thirteen percent of respondents say they are developing a policy, and 11% said they didn't know if their organization had a policy regarding PST files.

Are you able to balance the risks with user demands? Or do you think the issue is overblown? Let us know.

The full survey results will be available in a forthcoming InformationWeek Analytics Report.

« Is UC Tactical Or Strategic? | Main | Analyst: Android 'Ain't No iPhone,' Will Fail »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. HPC Joins the Dummy Revolution?
  2. Detecting Scalability Problems With Intel Parallel Universe Portal
  3. Just Say No To SFAQL Parallelism


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. HTC Droid Eris To Get Android 2.0 Update
  2. The Causality Behind Apple's Success
  3. iPhone Headed For T-Mobile?
  4. Intel Floats Cloud Computing On A Chip
  5. Verizon Says Droid Fix Coming In A Few Weeks


  1. Oracle To Plead Sun Acquisition Case Before EC
  2. Demand For Health IT Talent Rising
  3. Craigslist, eBay Face Off In Court
  4. Renault Outsources To Capgemini
  5. Google Search Goes Real Time
  6. Good Adds Android, iPhone Support

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007