The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Information Management Blog

Topics:   Information Management

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

LGR Test Drives HP Oracle Database Machine


Posted by Charles Babcock, Sep 25, 2008 04:43 PM

Oracle CEO Larry Ellison announced a high-end, high-performance HP Oracle Database Machine in San Francisco yesterday. LGR Telecommunications has been working with such a Database Machine for more than a year, while the kinks were still being ironed out. Chief architect Hannes van Rooyen says it's an ideal design for taking on massive data loads with rapid cycle times.


Van Rooyen concedes LGR, a supplier of custom telecom data warehouses, hasn't pushed an HP Oracle Database Machine out to one of its telecommunications customers yet. But its simulated production loads on the machine and found it handles them. To LGR, a production data warehouse should be built on the scale of the one it supplied to the largest U.S. telecommunications company -- you should be able to figure out who that is, but LGR isn't allowed to name it. It uses two 310-TB data warehouses, and needs to cycle lots of data back and forth between them. That's what the Database Machine is designed to do.

LGR won't be spending more time on beta tests. Now that the machines have become available, it plans to install one at two customer sites in the next few months, including that large customer in the U.S. Deploying a Database Machine, said van Rooyen, 28, is a lot faster than deploying additional servers and SAN arrays as your data warehouse grows. LGR ought to know. It's built a lot of standard data warehouses on high-end hardware, such as the HP Superdome, throwing disk arrays at the arrangement. "You have to run the host bus adapters (on the database servers) to the SAN array, reconfigure and rebalance the load," he says. It's a lot of skilled labor.

In one case, "we cycle 260 terabytes of data through the data warehouse every 90 days. There's a lot of velocity to our data," van Rooyen said in an interview at the Moscone Center as Oracle OpenWorld wound down. Telecom companies are trying to capture who's using what services where, what combinations of services, how frequently, and where the profit lies in combining services. To do so they need to deal with billions of small records after capturing and loading them into the data warehouse.

Van Rooyen said LGR is planning systems that can handle up to two petabytes of data. Parallel processing is a key to query performance against such large amounts of data, and the Oracle system does a good job of breaking queries down into parallel parts. "We push the core functionality of Oracle" to make use of its query optimization and use of Real Application Clusters, or a clustered version of one database on multiple servers.

Beyond that, LGR brings its expertise to bear to exploit the capacities of multicore chips. Big databases and complex queries are a problem for which multicore processors are the answer. Because both SQL queries and databases can be broken down into discrete parts, they lend themselves to parallel processing techniques better than many business applications, with their serial logic.

IBM, Netezza, Teradata, and others all have their uses of parallelism in their high-end data warehouse designs. But as van Rooyen points out, using it on standard hardware -- the database machine, in effect, is a small grid of HP Proliant servers, means LGR can produce telecom data warehouses, with their voracious appetite for CPU resources, at a much lower cost than in the past. The Oracle machine retails for $4,000 a terabyte, he noted.

Van Rooyen says HP may sell fewer Superdomes now that the database machine is available, but it may sell more database machines.

"Now when we need more storage, we plug in more Exadata Storage Servers. If we need CPU, who knows, Intel is going to six-core processors. Maybe we'll slide one blade out and another blade in," he said.

In one of LGR's installations, the data warehouse routinely consumes 99% of the CPU power available, and six-core CPUs will be welcome when they reach the site on new HP blades.

« Visa Bringing The Power Of Plastic To Android | Main | Four Companies Secure $143 Million In Funding »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  2. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?
  3. Coreinfo v2.0: A Simple Utility to Understand the Manycore Complexity in Windows


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Verizon: $350 ETF Is A Go
  4. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch


  1. Florida Hospital Dials Up iPhones For Nurses
  2. Full Nelson: A Web Presence Needs Sizzle, My Nizzle
  3. Is Antivirus Software Dead?
  4. Practical Analysis: The Fastest-Growing Security Threat
  5. InformationWeek Analytics Research: Federated Search
  6. Securing The Cyber Supply Chain

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007