Commentary

Walt Mossberg Posts In-Depth Review Of Google's Chrome

The Wall Street Journal's Walter Mossberg has been testing Google's Chrome browser for a week next to Firefox and the latest version of Microsoft's Internet Explorer. His verdict? "Chrome is a smart, innovative browser that, in many common scenarios, will make using the Web faster, easier, and less frustrating."

The Wall Street Journal's Walter Mossberg has been testing Google's Chrome browser for a week next to Firefox and the latest version of Microsoft's Internet Explorer. His verdict? "Chrome is a smart, innovative browser that, in many common scenarios, will make using the Web faster, easier, and less frustrating."What can I say, I am jealous. Mr. Mossberg gets to play with everything before anyone else does. First there was the iPhone. Then the 3G iPhone. Now Google's freshly available Chrome browser.

I downloaded the browser myself a few moments ago and am still developing my first impressions. Upon set up, Chrome automatically imported all of my Firefox bookmarks and settings. On my crusty, old Panasonic WinXP machine, it is running a bit slow. I blame the PC more then I do the browser in this case. Mr. Mossberg, who was running faster gear than I, blamed the browser. He said, "Despite Google's claims that Chrome is fast, it was notably slower in my tests at the common task of launching Web pages than either Firefox or Safari."


More Internet Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

In my first few moments of use, I was tooling around the Chrome-specific Web pages to learn more about it when one of the Chrome pages crashed. I saw an amusing error message that read, "Aw, snap! The web page you were attempting to load is unresponsive." This tickled my funny bone a bit.

InformationWeek Reports

Using Chrome will definitely take some getting used to. With Firefox, the tabs are all placed below the address bar. In Chrome, they are all above it. This means extra travel time with your mouse. Mossberg writes, "Chrome does away with most menus and toolbar icons to give maximum screen space for the Web pages themselves. Also, Google has merged the address bar, where you type in Web addresses, with the search box, where you type in search terms. This unified feature is called the Omnibox. One striking difference in Chrome is how it handles tabs, which display a single Web page. In Chrome, each tab behaves as a separate browser. The bookmarks bar, Omnibox, menus and toolbar icons are located inside the tab, rather than atop the entire browser. The tabs appear at the top of the computer screen. Chrome also groups related tabs."

I like that it is fairly simple to create shortcuts to applications, and set up home pages that are built "speed-dial" fashion, showing you a tiled collection of your favorite Web sites.

My favorite activity so far was to "go incognito". When you launch a new incognito windows, you get this message: "Pages you view in this window won't appear in your browser history or search history, and they won't leave other traces, like cookies, on your computer after you close the incognito windows. Any files you download or bookmarks you create will be preserved, however." Interesting. It includes some warnings, including one that says to beware of "people standing behind you." The incognito browser window has different coloration than the regular window, and has a picture of a be-hatted and be-jacketed G-man character. Nice touch.

How well does it work overall? Mossberg says, "In general, it did well, rendering the sites properly. But I ran into problems with video. Some video sites refused to recognize Chrome, because its development has been a secret." Of course, he includes far more information in his review, because he has had the chance to spend a week with the browser.

As for my own 30-minute analysis? It's a good first effort. I like it more than IE8, Safari, or Camino. I'll have to test it against Opera and Firefox feature-for-feature to see how it rates against the two browsers I use most.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links