Commentary

Serdar Yegulalp
 

Web 2.0: Unison And Ubuntu

Time for some serendipity. I sat down with Rurik Bradbury of Unison to talk about its unified messaging solutions for Windows and Linux, and ended up with a strong hint as to how the commercial application space for Linux might get a boost.

Time for some serendipity. I sat down with Rurik Bradbury of Unison to talk about its unified messaging solutions for Windows and Linux, and ended up with a strong hint as to how the commercial application space for Linux might get a boost.


More Software Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

First, Unison. It's essentially a very elegant-looking Exchange killer that uses Linux as a server and runs on both Windows and Linux for the client. The client strongly resembles Outlook, so most folks familiar with that program can dive in and get going with little retaining. Aside from e-mail, Unison also does voice calls, instant messaging, calendaring, directory services, and a bunch of other things you used to need separate servers for. All of the protocols used are open standards: LDAP, IMAP, SIP, and so on. The client/server combo is free (as in beer, that is) for up to ten users.

Now comes the interesting part: it's working on a version for Ubuntu which will be distributed -- both the client and the server components -- via Ubuntu's own app repositories. Granted, it's being kept separate from the pure FOSS apps since it's not FOSS itself, but that's precisely what makes this particular item so intriguing. Rurik also hinted that a whole slew of different proprietary apps are to be added to the repositories shortly. He couldn't name names since he's under NDA, but the mere fact that this is happening is an eye-opener.

This to me has been one of the biggest hurdles for Linux: how to deliver commercial-grade software elegantly. Using the software repositories is one of the first things people learn when they sit down with a given distribution. If said commercial apps are segregated into their own non-free repository and delivered with the blessings of the manufacturer, it becomes a snap to get them up and running.

What's not as clear is whether or not this will be a way to deliver for-pay commercial applications as well -- or, rather, whether or not people will avail themselves of a technique like this to do so. This is assuming, of course, that full-blown for-pay applications find traction on Linux desktops, as opposed to FOSS apps with support for sale.

I almost feel bad for talking about this issue at the expense of discussing Unison as a product. Give it a whirl and see what you think. Me, I'm also going to be keeping an ear peeled for future app distribution developments of this variety.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links