The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Content Management Blog

Topics:   Content Management

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

What Does Gartner's ECM Magic Quadrant Mean To You?


Posted by Peter Hagopian, Sep 29, 2008 10:44 PM

Content management reports and analysis always are interesting fodder for discussion, and now that Gartner's 2008 Magic Quadrant report on enterprise content management is complete, it's certain to have an equal number of vendors crowing about their inclusion, as well as those who question Gartner's findings.


In a nutshell, Gartner's Magic Quadrant reports identify and rate two key attributes for each vendor: their ability to execute and the completeness of their vision. The sweet spot is the upper right-hand corner of the grid, which assembles the vendors that excel in both areas.

CMS Wire has a good, albeit SharePoint-centric article on the results, which shows us that EMC, IBM, Microsoft, Open Text, and Oracle lead the way, with other vendors nipping at their heels.

This year's report takes a look at a total of 18 enterprise content management vendors, including the mainstays mentioned above, as well as Interwoven, SAP, and some lesser-known (but solid) names such as Alfresco, Day Software, and Xythos.

While Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) doesn't lead overall -- that honor appears to go to EMC -- it continues to be the closest thing to a household name that the enterprise content management industry has, which tends to make it the center of attention.

It's not available on the site yet but, Gartner should offer the individual report for sale soon. It's also probably worth noting that Gartner's Magic Quadrant reports are generally pricey -- usually around $2,000 for 15 to 20 pages of content -- so that may be a consideration for some organizations.

« SOA Applications In Virtual Machines? Experience Matters | Main | Scareware Purveyors To Get Legal Thrashing »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  2. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?
  3. Coreinfo v2.0: A Simple Utility to Understand the Manycore Complexity in Windows


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Verizon: $350 ETF Is A Go
  4. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch


  1. Florida Hospital Dials Up iPhones For Nurses
  2. Is Antivirus Software Dead?
  3. Securing The Cyber Supply Chain
  4. CIO Profiles: Christopher Rence, Chief Information And Business Transformation Officer Of FICO
  5. InformationWeek Analytics Research: Federated Search
  6. Practical Analysis: The Fastest-Growing Security Threat

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007