Commentary

Crybabies Emerge After Wal-Mart G1 Discount Announced

Remember how ticked off people were when Apple dropped the price of the iPhone from $600 to $400 last year? People cried foul in droves. In light of Wal-Mart's announcement that it's going to sell the Android phone for $31 less than it costs at T-Mobile stores, people are complaining.

Remember how ticked off people were when Apple dropped the price of the iPhone from $600 to $400 last year? People cried foul in droves. In light of Wal-Mart's announcement that it's going to sell the Android phone for $31 less than it costs at T-Mobile stores, people are complaining.InformationWeek sister site ChannelWeb has posted an article titled "5 Reasons Against Wal-Mart Selling the T-Mobile G1." In it, the author posits reasons why the $31 price drop is bad.

The writer's biggest complaint is that the price of the phone has dropped by 17% a week after the device's release. He says, "Yes, it's wise to shop around before spending, but in the case of the T-Mobile G1, buyers who wanted the device right away didn't have an option. It was either pre-order it online or buy it at a T-Mobile store. Either way, the device was coming directly from T-Mobile and carried a price tag of $179.99. ... I don't think I'd mind so much if it was a few months later and Wal-Mart slashed the price, but a week is a really fast turnaround time. Why make such dramatic changes right out of the gate? From all that I've heard and read, the G1 has been selling well, so it wasn't really a move of desperation on T-Mobile's part."


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

I can understand his ire. I was one of the many irked iPhone customers who paid full price for the device when it was launched, only to see later adopters get the phone for $200 less. I wasn't the only one. Such a loud chorus was sung by upset iPhone owners that Apple eventually offered early adopters a $100 credit at Apple stores.

I don't know if it was T-Mobile's, HTC's, or Google's idea to sell the G1 at Wal-Mart stores, but all three companies have the right to distribute their products as they choose.

Wal-Mart has serious purchasing power and a highly developed supply chain. This is part of what allows it to offer lower prices than other retailers. Wal-Mart sells nearly everything for less than its competitors. That's the whole reason the chain has been successful. I don't think we should be surprised that it has the ability to offer the G1 for a price point lower than others.

I don't see T-Mobile placating early adopters of the G1 in the way that Apple did. And $31 isn't nearly as large or bothersome a sum as $200.

(BTW, the G1 was supposed to go on sale yesterday at Wal-Mart. Turns out shipping snafus have delayed the launch until Nov. 4.)


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links