The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Backup and Business Continuity Blog

Topics:   Backup and Business Continuity

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Drop-Testing Drives


Posted by Howard Marks, Oct 5, 2008 03:45 PM

I don't know if the it was the heat or just a lack of better things to do, but drop-testing drives seems to have replaced Vespa jousting as the geek sport of the month in August. First Popular Mechanics magazine ran a portable USB hard drive drop test, subjecting several drives to higher and higher drops until they failed. Video here. Then Samsung tossed one of its laptop SSDs off the roof of its building in sillycone valley and, wonder of wonders, it booted the laptop they screwed it into. Video here.

So other than a few laughs, what value do demonstrations like this have? What can we learn and how can we adjust our practices?

The first lesson we should all accept is that the 2.5-inch drive designed for laptop use is substantially more rugged than the drives designed for desktop or server use. A typical laptop drive is rated at 350 Gs when operating and 900 Gs when powered down. It's 3.5-inch equivalent is rated just 70/300.

Part of the reason laptop drives can, as John Cameron Swayze used to say, take a licking and keep on kicking, is the ramp unload mechanism that, like the tonearm rest on a turntable (that, kiddies, is what we used to use to play music before CDs), removes the drive's heads from the platters at power down. Most 3.5-inch drives just let the heads land on a non-data bearing section of the platter.

Add in Hitachi's accelerometer that can detect when the drive is in free fall and retract the heads in 140 ms (or about 4 inches of fall in Earth's gravitational field of 32 ft/s/s) and even a running drive can handle a bunch of shock. Since the SSD has no moving parts at all, it can handle 1,500 Gs whether it is powered up or not.

So those of you using USB drives as backup targets and schlepping them around to get your data off-site should be using 2.5-inch drives.

While the Popular Mechanics testing was fun to watch, you really can't draw any conclusions from it. They only used one sample of each drive model and just tossed them in the air, so the drives that failed may have landed in the direction they were most vulnerable to shock and the ones that passed safely may have landed on their backs, where the air trapped under the drive provided some cushioning.

All in all, good, clean fun.

« Microsoft OOXML Controversy Rises Again | Main | NOAA's Tracking Site Shows Historical Storm Activity »



Sign up now for the weekly InformationWeek Blog Newsletter.


This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.






  1. Twitter In Controversial Spotlight Amid Mumbai Attacks
  2. Google Round Up: Evil Layoffs, Chrome Speed Test, Street Views
  3. iPhone 2.2 Images Hit The Web
  4. iPhone Firmware 2.2 Breaking Some Apps
  5. Don't Shut Off Vista UAC, There's A Better Way


  1. WiMax Future Remains Unclear With Clearwire
  2. Texas Instruments Ranked Top MID Platform Vendor
  3. Alcatel-Lucent Could Dump Mobiles To End Pain
  4. Lenovo Offers Hardware-Based Security In ThinkPad Laptop
  5. Qualcomm Ruling Affirmed, Vacated In Part-U.S. Court
  6. Yahoo's Top Search Terms Of 2008

 

 
  • To the Point: EMC and VMware Redefining Backup with Deduplication
  • ESG Lab Validation Report: EMC Avamar Revolutionizing Backup and Recovery
  • VMware White Paper: Optimized Backup and Recovery for Vmware Infrastructure with EMC Avamar


  •  

      Ars Technica
    Boing Boing
    Channel 9 Forums
    CRN Blogs
    Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
    Engadget
    Gizmodo
    GrokLaw
      Lifehacker
    Schneier on Security
    Slashdot
    TechCrunch
    Techdirt
    Techmeme
    Valleywag

      SEPTEMBER 2008
    AUGUST 2008
    JULY 2008
    JUNE 2008
    MAY 2008
    APRIL 2008
    MARCH 2008
    FEBRUARY 2008
      JANUARY 2008
    DECEMBER 2007
    NOVEMBER 2007
    OCTOBER 2007
    SEPTEMBER 2007
    AUGUST 2007
    JULY 2007
    JUNE 2007