Commentary

Serdar Yegulalp
 

'Linux-Haters Blog' Signs Off

As of last Saturday, the infamous Linux Hater's Blog has signed off. Seekers of curmudgeonly wisdom about Linux cleverly disguised as flaming bile will have to look elsewhere. And, strangely enough, I already miss him.

As of last Saturday, the infamous Linux Hater's Blog has signed off. Seekers of curmudgeonly wisdom about Linux cleverly disguised as flaming bile will have to look elsewhere. And, strangely enough, I already miss him.


More Software Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Back in May or so, the LHB started posting a patented brand of blunt-nosed realism, foul-mouthed trash-talking, and brutal humor of the Triumph, the Insult Comic Dog variety. Over time, though, a pattern and (no!) a method to the madness emerged: he wasn't actually against Linux per se, but what he saw as the forest of inadequacies, incompetence, lame excuses, bad planning, and even worse execution that prevented Linux from being all that it could be.

His rants could tear the skin off a rhinoceros. He railed against the insane maze that was Linux audio, he showed up the fallacy of choice as being a primary reason Linux was doomed to never make headway on the desktop, and let fly at the Linux graphics layer for being a mess of hackwork. (Warning: all of those links contain Denis-Leary-in-concert levels of swearing.) He also was that much more technically informed about his subjects than most of the people who go on anti-Linux tirades. And when he dialed back the vitriol and made his case plainly, it was hard to see how he was wrong:

[C]urrent lusers [his euphemism for "Linux users"; you can guess why he chose this particular term] don't want choice between two or more options that are broken. They want a working baseline, and then they want to be able to make all the choices they personally care about. Unfortunately, there are very few projects that are concentrated on developing this working baseline. Instead they usually try to build one small piece of the puzzle, then make it interface with as many other parts in numerous and useless ways.

You know why I'm going to miss him? Not because he had the potty-mouthed outlandishness of Andrew Dice Clay -- although some people love that sort of thing, what can I say -- but because he went places few others dared to go and didn't apologize for his excesses. One of William Blake's most-repeated quotes is, "The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom," and while I don't always agree that's the only way to get to wisdom's palace, it can be one of the most entertaining ones.

Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/syegulalp


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links