The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

Security

Topics:   Security

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Microsoft Readies For Likelihood Of Attacks


Posted by George Hulme, Oct 13, 2008 01:29 PM

We provided you the heads up about the Microsoft "Exploitability Index" a couple of months ago when the software company announced the new index, designed to predict the likelihood its security vulnerabilities would be attacked. It's an interesting idea, but will it have much value for practitioners?


This month's patch Tuesday, which is tomorrow, will be when Microsoft first attaches this exploit index to its current threat ratings. Threat ratings, as you probably know, are ranked in a series of "low" through "critical" depending on the nature of the flaw. This is how the exploitability index will look, from a story that detailed Microsoft's announcement:

1) Consistent Exploit Code Likely
2) Inconsistent Exploit Code Likely, and
3) Functioning Exploit Code Unlikely

The first one means a software flaw could be attacked with highly predictable results, and would probably be very easy to exploit. This would be very bad, as exploits would surface, and would be turned into weapons for mass use. This would be a critical vulnerability, and would need to be patched. Designation two could be bad, or it could be not-so-bad. Maybe an attacker could create an exploit, maybe not. And how the at-risk system reacts to the attack may not be very predictable. The third designation, Functioning Exploit Code Unlikely, is obvious: Microsoft has determined that developing a useful, functional attack tool would not be likely.

My opinion from back then hasn't changed from my original post, which is that this won't be of much value to operations teams trying to assess their risk. Tomorrow, and in the months ahead, we'll see if it works as intended.

« To Linux, On Your 17th Birthday | Main | Video: Rob Enderle, Aviva CIO Toby Redshaw Debate Tech Future »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. No Silver Bullet for Parallelism
  2. Think Parallel 2010, Five Years of Multicore
  3. It's All In the Strategy, It's All About the Design


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


  1. Verizon Wireless Details Android 2.1 Update For Droid
  2. Why Microsoft Is The New Apple
  3. Flop Or Not, Nexus One Headed To AT&T
  4. No Copy And Paste For Windows Phone 7


  1. Viacom Secretly Uploaded Videos, YouTube Claims
  2. Windows Phone 7 Lacks Flash Support
  3. Ericsson In Talks To Buy LG Nortel Stake
  4. Google Calendar Now Finds Best Meeting Time
  5. Google, Intel, Sony Plan Android TV Platform
  6. Amazon Launches Kindle For Mac

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007