Commentary

Serdar Yegulalp
 

The End Of The World -- LinuxWorld, That Is

I didn't go to LinuxWorld this year. People who did go told me I didn't miss anything. Now LinuxWorld itself is being rebranded as the OpenSource World Conference & Expo -- a sign for me that a) Linux is that much more mainstream and b) it's getting subsumed that much more into open source as a whole.

I didn't go to LinuxWorld this year. People who did go told me I didn't miss anything. Now LinuxWorld itself is being rebranded as the OpenSource World Conference & Expo -- a sign for me that a) Linux is that much more mainstream and b) it's getting subsumed that much more into open source as a whole.


More Software Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

I already had reasons for not going to LinuxWorld. It was a week after OSCON, which was everything I'd hoped it would be and then some; my travel budget was already stretched; and LinuxWorld was right on top of my best friend's wedding, which I'd made ironclad promises to attend. But from word passed on to me by other attendees, LinuxWorld had been remarkably lame.

To me, it sounded like the need for a Linux-specific, industry-oriented expo was on the way out. Linux isn't an oddity anymore; it's a reputable piece of the enterprise. It's that much less necessary to sell people on Linux per se, since it's one of open source's most prominent success stories. But there's still a need to wake people up to open source as a whole, and Linux is again only one slice of that pie.

Another possible reason for LinuxWorld being re-thought: because Linux is that much less of an oddity, there's that much less need for a sales-oriented expo. (By contrast, the Linux Foundation's recently announced LinuxCon is long on tech and short on sales.)

On the whole, though, I see this as good news. If we need that many less Linux-specific conferences because Linux is now just part of the air we breathe, that's a step -- shilling for leap -- in the right direction.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links