The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Information Management Blog

Topics:   Compliance : Information Management : Security

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

The PCI Protection Racket


Posted by Andrew Conry-Murray, Oct 27, 2008 01:05 PM

A hotel operator says his point-of-sale vendor is using PCI as an excuse to force expensive upgrades to POS equipment.


I've criticized the PCI security standards, which aim to protect credit card data from being stolen, because of the way "compliance" can be gamed without necessarily making card data safer.

Now comes an e-mail from a reader who says his POS vendor is taking advantage of PCI to force him into more frequent -- and thus more expensive -- equipment upgrades. The mail comes from Jake Star, VP of technology at a company that owns and operates brand-name hotels in 16 states.

I'll let Mr. Star's e-mail speak for itself, but I'd also like to know if you've experienced something similar. Conversely, if you think this is just the cost of keeping data secure and will actually help protect card data in the long run, I welcome your comments.

Here's Mr. Star's e-mail. (Note that I obtained his permission before posting this message.)

I've been a relative cynic about PCI DSS compliance, especially since it seems that the volume of exposed cardholder data has simply increased since PCI has been in place. But I'm running across a new way in which PCI is sapping our limited IT budgets. As a merchant, I've got to ensure that the point-of-sale applications I use are PCI-certified. So I spent almost $1 Million upgrading systems last year. The POS vendor has a .X release each year, so I have a combination of systems on version 1.1 and 1.2. This year, they released 1.3. PCI comes out with a update to their standard (PCI DSS is version 1.2 as of October). There are no significant changes in the standard that would make a previous system noncompliant, but the POS vendor still needs to certify with the new version. The POS vendor, blaming everything on PCI, says they can only certify their two most recent version (1.2 and 1.3). Voila! All my 1.1 systems are magically no longer compliant and need to be upgraded. It is safe to assume that new a new PCI update will come out again next year. Therefore, the POS vendor has just effectively changed the lifecycle of their software from 5-7 years down to 2. Combine that with a strategy which requires you to retire older POS terminals in order to use the new version, and they now get 40% of the original system cost every two years. The moral of the story is that when companies purchase their software, they should include a clause in the contract that requires the vendor maintain compliance with PCI for a certain period of time or offer free upgrades.

« Android's Mobile Email An Epic Fail? | Main | Why Windows 7 Doesn't Compute »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  2. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?
  3. Coreinfo v2.0: A Simple Utility to Understand the Manycore Complexity in Windows


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch
  4. Sprint And T-Mobile Headed The Wrong Direction


  1. 9 In 10 Web Apps Have Serious Flaws
  2. Agency For International Development Outsources To CSC
  3. Health IT Career Tips
  4. RIM, Adobe Team For BlackBerry Development
  5. Hadoop Crunches Web-Sized Data
  6. Microsoft Acquires SourceGear's Teamprise Unit

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007