The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Content Management Blog

Topics:   Content Management

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

A Critical Look At Content Management Interoperability Services


Posted by Peter Hagopian, Nov 14, 2008 09:04 PM

It's been an interesting two months since the announcement of the proposed Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) standard. While some vendors rapidly got on board -- Alfresco, for example, released the first implementation of CMIS -- other companies, such as Day Software, have alternately supported and gently poked holes in the proposal.

Since the Alfresco announcement, a number of other vendors have also released their own implementations, including EMC's Documentum and IBM's IBM FileNet Content Manager and Sense/Nets. No doubt there will be many more to follow.

Even with all the attention paid to the proposal, much confusion still surrounds it. Fortunately for those whose heads are still spinning, CMSWire.com's Barb Mosher posted a terrific piece last week offering a high-level overview of the proposed standard. The piece, titled De-Hyping CMIS, cuts through much of the noise surrounding CMIS, focusing on what it will mean in real-world implementations.

From the article:


Is (CMIS) the perfect solution? Maybe. Maybe not. But the fact that something has been developed that ECMs and other application developers can work with to provide an integrated view of an organization's content is a step in the direction we need to go.

We all know the days of a single, in-house ECM system are pretty much over. SharePoint has already taken care of that. We need something to give us hope that our content is manageable -- regardless of where it's located. CMIS does that.

While the debate over the proposed standard will no doubt continue to smolder until it is ultimately approved (or not), it's certain to be a big part of any technical conversations on content management. In the meantime, Mosher's article serves as a good primer for the issues and controversies surrounding the proposed standard.

« Pssst. What's Your Password? | Main | McAfee's Cybercrime Response Unit Prepares For Launch »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 

  1. Actors, Messages and Low Lock Contention for Java
  2. Of Course The Transformers are Multicore with SMT technology
  3. Find John Fast!!


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. Why I'm Dropping Bing For Google
  2. 3G iPhone Burns User
  3. 64-Bit Firefox: What's Your Hurry?
  4. So Long, And Thanks, Google Earth, For All The Fish
  5. Windows 7 Pricing: How Much Lower?


  1. Review: Apple's Speedy iPhone 3GS
  2. Tech Innovation USA: From Resilient Networks To Self-Scheduling Devices
  3. How Government's Driving Cloud Computing Ahead
  4. Government As Early Adopter
  5. InformationWeek Analytics: Data Loss Prevention
  6. Strategic Security: Web Single Sign-On

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007