Commentary

Dave Methvin
 

Cloud Computing Issues Are Different, But Familiar

David Berlind points out the difficulty of assigning blame with mashups built out of cloud technologies. One "simple" solution, the one that Microsoft might like you to consider, is getting all your cloud technologies from a single vendor. That's not likely to solve the problem.

David Berlind points out the difficulty of assigning blame with mashups built out of cloud technologies. One "simple" solution, the one that Microsoft might like you to consider, is getting all your cloud technologies from a single vendor. That's not likely to solve the problem.The starting point for this conversation is an excellent blog entry by Brandon Watson of Microsoft, who recently shepherded the launch of Microsoft's Azure Services Platform. He summarizes the dilemma of mashups and cloud computing using the phrase, "Whose throat do I choke?" That is, whom do you blame when things go wrong?

Although the names and technologies have changed, the problem of assigning blame isn't that different. In a conventional Web site, there are plenty of opportunities to mess up features, performance, and security. You have to create a complex hardware mix of Web servers, application servers, and database servers that can handle the load. You have to maintain and manage both the hardware, software, and network infrastructure. And, oh yeah, you have to write an application. With all that complexity, it's sometimes hard for even an expert to tell where the problems lie.


More Windows Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

For example, I have seen people blame "slow hardware" when the real problem is that someone forgot to add a crucial index on a particular database table. Fortunately, SQL Server has tools that make it possible to identify the bottlenecks and determine the solutions. At the moment, mashups don't have those kind of tools. You may need to resort to similarly mashed-up debugging tools such as Wireshark, Fiddler, and Firebug to determine what's going on with the client. As for the cloud side of the equation, I've yet to see the tools that services like Azure will provide to let mashup architects find and fix performance problems.

There is also, of course, the question of reliability. Failures of services such as Amazon S3 have made many professionals skittish about using cloud services. However, I think that much of this is just the teething pains of a new industry. A decade ago, professional Web hosting services were dismal as well. I thought the turning point happened when the SQL Slammer worm hit; hosting companies realized it was in their interest to avoid chaos. We may need to see the same kind of disaster attack cloud services before they get their act together.

To sum it up, the details are different with mashups, but the system design issues are not so alien. There are no shortcuts for knowing what the heck your application is doing, no matter how you build it. There absolutely must be tools available so that you can peer into the cloud far enough to know where the performance bottlenecks lie.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links