The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

InformationWeek's Analytics Weblog

Topics:   Analytics : Global CIO : Virtualization

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Does Management Get Virtualization?


Posted by Art Wittmann, Nov 18, 2008 01:39 PM

We're in the middle of a project where we'd proposed to measure the difference in perception of virtualization between business decision makers and technology decision makers. At the same time, we're looking at the same perceptions for advanced Web technology -- stuff like Ajax, the trend of adding collaboration and BI capabilities into apps. I've been surprised by the results.


We've done dozens of studies this year, and what we've noticed is that responses typically come 50% to 60% from IT management (technology decision makers, or TDMs), 20% or 25% from IT staff, and 20% or 25% from non-IT management (business decision makers, or BDMs). For these two projects, we'd planned to compare the responses of these two groups to the same set of questions. The idea being to help understand the differences in perceptions between these groups to these relatively new and important technologies.

Interestingly, we got a good sample of BDMs responding on advanced Web capabilities, but we couldn't get a decent response from BDMs for virtualization. We tried a few times and a few ways, but they didn't respond in adequate numbers to yield defensible numbers (we've seen other surveys with similarly low responses for virtualiztion). The BDMs who did respond were mostly from small companies -- probably ones with an IT/technology predisposition, though we didn't check for that.

We've been puzzling on why BDMs don't seem to have much of an opinion on virtualiztion. I think there are two things going on here. First of all, the real business advantage for virtualization has yet to be realized for most companies. So far, the major advantages to its use have been for test and development, and for server consolidation. For test and development, we've seen companies claim good results -- shorter development times and lower cost to their testing infrastructure. However, these weren't revolutionary changes since the fundamental development methodologies didn't change -- developers just didn't have to spend time in the test lab to see if their code modifications worked. For server consolidation, we see almost no one claiming vastly reduced numbers of servers, rather the rate of growth in server counts was substantially slowed -- but in many cases, only for a while.

These initial benefits are very important to IT since the result is significant internal savings vs. life without virtualization. However, while the rest of the business might hear IT raving about how great virtualization is, they really haven't seen a significant change in application performance or availability. The result, I think, is that BDMs are probably supportive of virtualization, but until they see something a little more tangible, they aren't willing to jump on the happy hype train just yet.

The second wave of virtualization is just beginning, which involves virtualizing strategic production applications. Here probably the first benefit that BDMs are likely to see from IT is the end of (or a significant reduction in) application maintenance windows. They also should see a better ability on the part of IT to immediately meet any variable loads the apps might see. Both of these will be important to BDMs, but only if IT has the means (usually dashboards of some sort) to show the improved performance.

Getting those improvements isn't a sure thing, either. The ability to actually monitor an app's performance in a virtualized environment is currently a very hard thing to do, as the tools are immature. We've also heard of failures -- for instance, one of our SOA-focused contributors has talked about one of his clients trying to move its SOA apps to virtualized servers and the result was instability in the app's performance, including a lot of down time.

The third wave will leverage things like cloud computing so that, for instance, an organization like a Harry and David's could leverage the cloud (either internal or external) for resources it needs only three months of the year, rather than keeping all that usually idle capacity in-house.

You can see the succession of importance and relevance to BDMs here. One of the biggest advantages to virtualization is going to be how much complexity and cost the company never saw because virtualization is in place.

So what does your non-IT management think of virtualization and how important is it for you to sell them on it?

« Climate Group Urges Smart Technologies | Main | Career Tips For IT Pros In A Rotten Economy »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Massive Parallelism Has a Name ... Extreme Scale Computing
  2. Intel Turbo Boost Technology Monitor: A Windows Gadget to Understand Dynamic Frequencies
  3. Two-Stage Input Parallel Pipeline: Part 2


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


  1. Latest Windows Mobile 7 Rumors
  2. Android 2.1 With Multitouch Headed To Motorola Droid
  3. Google's Universal Translator
  4. Rating The Mobile Superbowl Ads


  1. Microsoft Fixes 26 Vulnerabilities In Windows, Office
  2. Intel Ships Itanium Server Processor
  3. Commerce Department Proposes One-Stop Climate Service
  4. Microsoft Denies Windows 7 Battery Bug
  5. Google Buzz Challenges Facebook, Twitter
  6. Android, iPhone Gain In Smartphone Market

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007