Commentary

Thomas Claburn
 

Google SearchWiki Must Die

Google's SearchWiki must die. It's a fine idea, allowing people to re-rank search results and comment on them. Viva democracy.

Google's SearchWiki must die. It's a fine idea, allowing people to re-rank search results and comment on them. Viva democracy.But making everyone's comments available for everyone to see undermines the aura of neutrality that Google has cultivated and turns the Google search results page into a potentially hostile environment for advertisers.

Consider some of the comments appended to the 73 comments currently filed under the Microsoft Corporation Web site:


More Internet Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

"Hi, I'm a Mac!"

"Microsoft sucks."

"They are sucking less... but they still suck."

And under Google:

"Google is awesome!"

"IS AMAZING!!!!!!!!!"

One person commenting under Google gets it: "For popular keywords, this isn't going to scale. For less trafficked ones, one asinine reviewer can hurt the experience for everyone."

Most of the comments I have seen do nothing to enhance the user search experience or to provide useful information. They are a waste of bandwidth.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but not every opinion deserves to be broadcast on Google. (Go tell it to YouTube.)

Consider this SearchWiki comment posted under Sarah Palin's Wikipedia entry listing: "The first mentally handicapped woman to become governor of Alaska. Despite her disability she still manages the impressive feat of reading ALL the newspapers."

I didn't vote for her, but I see no reason why Google's search page has to become a forum for disrespect.

Google wants to take a hands-off approach and let users clean up the comments by voting them down. But why should users be obligated to clean up the mess Google has enabled? (If anything, Google should be paying users per click to police SearchWiki.)

I'm fairly sure Google is aware of the problems with SearchWiki, which is why the implementation is such a kludge. Putting the link to display all SearchWiki comments at the bottom of the page is one step away from burying the option.

The fact that Google doesn't index SearchWiki comments, to make them accessible via search, suggests that Google doesn't consider user comments to be legitimate information. Google's mission after all is to "organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful."

There's also no URL or identifier to link to specific comments, which presumably one would want if they provided valuable information.

And if user comments are not valuable, why bother including them at all?

Google should take SearchWiki offline and re-work it so that one can only see the comments from friends in one's Gmail address book or from social networking friends lists. It should make those comments viewable with a simple button alongside every search result, rather than though a link at the bottom of the search results page.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links