The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

InformationWeek's Analytics Weblog

Topics:   Analytics : Green Computing

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

New 'MPG' Metric For Data Centers


Posted by Roger Smith, Nov 19, 2008 12:35 PM

While data centers consume massive amounts of energy, most data centers have become massively more efficient over the past several years.


This is an important point made in a new white paper, Energy Logic: Calculating and Prioritizing Your Data Center IT Efficiency Actions, by Emerson Network Power, which introduces a new metric to measure data center efficiency that Emerson hopes will have some of the same value that the miles-per-gallon (MPG) metric provides as an easily understood and agreed-upon efficiency measure for cars. Adding context to the improvements the computing industry has made in output and efficiency, the white paper notes, "While auto efficiency achieved a modest 0.8 percent compound annual growth rate, data center efficiency grew by 53 percent annually. If fuel efficiency had kept pace with data center efficiency improvements, the current generation of automobiles would average 163 MPG."

Specifically, the new Energy Logic white paper introduces the concept of CUPS, or Compute Units per Second, which is a relative measure of server output, based on average server performance in 2002. Using data from multiple industry sources, Emerson calculated the change in CUPS between 2002 and 2007, showing that while data center energy consumption has risen in recent years, the increases are overshadowed by dramatic gains in output and efficiency. "If data center output had remained flat between 2002 and 2007, the efficiency improvements achieved would have cut 2007 data center consumption to one-eighth the 2002 consumption."

CUPS can be the numerator in the equation that determines compute efficiency for individual devices and/or data centers as a whole, with the power draw as the denominator, i.e. Compute Efficiency = CUPS/Watts Consumed. According to the white paper "Server efficiency, measured in CUPS/watt, grew 658 percent (7.6x) between 2002 and 2007. Data center efficiency, aided by infrastructure improvements, achieved even more impressive gains. CUPS/data center watt grew by 738 percent (8.4x) during the same period." Data center professionals can experiment with the new CUPS metric in an online data center efficiency calculator.

The white paper points up several shortcomings in the Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) metric currently proposed as an interim measure of efficiency and makes a compelling case that any acceptable efficiency metric should meet at least three criteria:

1. It should drive the right behavior.
2. It should be available and published at the IT device level to help buyers make the right choice.
3. It should be fully-scalable from the IT device to the data center level.

"In some cases, [if management is driving a specific metric like PUE] this could force decisions that – though on the surface may save some energy – are clearly NOT the best ROI, are not the decisions that would save the MOST energy, and may in fact jeopardized performance (computational, storage, and network) or increase the likelihood of a significant failure," said Jack Pouchet, director of energy initiatives for Emerson Network Power. "Sadly, there are well-intentioned individuals and organizations pushing efficiency improvements at any and all costs. At the end of the day, saving $50,000 or even $100,000 a month in operating expense to then lose your data center for several hours or days, when downtime and recovery costs are over $1,000,000 an hour, is not a wise decision."

Asked whether the CUPS metric is consistent at the device level since the average server was single core in 2002 and the average server these days is multi-core, Pouchet responded "The fact that a server may have 1 or a dozen processors is less of an issue at the data center level as we are looking at raw computational performance. That can be achieved through clock-rate, topology, software, silicon, RAM, drives, network/comms, etc. in any combination and has been as we have moved along the design continuum. We can expect the next five years to equal the past by using similar techniques. The net result that we are attempting to capture is the significant increase in performance from all technologies and design practices within the IT equipment space."

Reiterating a point made in the white paper that the greatest efficiency gains can be achieved through faster replacement of high-density computing equipment (including power and cooling products), Pouchet said "The CUPS proxy curve can be developed similarly for networking and storage devices. We encourage the industry to bring forward their representative performance curves to enable data center operators to then make more intelligent hardware configuration, upgrade, and refresh decisions."

« Google Can't Tell The Difference Between 'iPhone' And 'Sex' | Main | Wal-Mart Nabs The iPhone? »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Massive Parallelism Has a Name ... Extreme Scale Computing
  2. Intel Turbo Boost Technology Monitor: A Windows Gadget to Understand Dynamic Frequencies
  3. Two-Stage Input Parallel Pipeline: Part 2


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


  1. Latest Windows Mobile 7 Rumors
  2. Android 2.1 With Multitouch Headed To Motorola Droid
  3. Google's Universal Translator
  4. Rating The Mobile Superbowl Ads


  1. Microsoft Fixes 26 Vulnerabilities In Windows, Office
  2. Intel Ships Itanium Server Processor
  3. Commerce Department Proposes One-Stop Climate Service
  4. Microsoft Denies Windows 7 Battery Bug
  5. Google Buzz Challenges Facebook, Twitter
  6. Android, iPhone Gain In Smartphone Market

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007