Commentary

Kevin Ferguson
 

Proposed EPA Green Guidelines Lend Credibility

The U.S. EPA has proposed five changes to its Green Power Partnership program that will affect how Intel, Cisco, and other large purchasers of renewable energy credits (RECs) are credited. The five changes, proposed to take effect on Feb. 13, 2009, lend credibility and accountability to green efforts.

The U.S. EPA has proposed five changes to its Green Power Partnership program that will affect how Intel, Cisco, and other large purchasers of renewable energy credits (RECs) are credited. The five changes, proposed to take effect on Feb. 13, 2009, lend credibility and accountability to green efforts.The proposed changes are as follows:

1) Minimum purchase levels for program participation: minimum purchase requirements will increase for all four usage categories (more than 100,000 megawatt hours; 10,000 to 100,000 mWh; 1,000 to 10,000 mWh, and less than 1,000 mWh)


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

2) Requirements for new renewable energy purchases: 100% of a power purchases must come from "new facilities," defined as becoming operational on or after January 1, 1997

3) Rules for accounting for future RECs: no longer allows partners to count RECs to be generated in future years toward their current year's purchase

4) Green power claims: the proposal would require that partners with branded franchise facilities which they do not own disclose whether or not the purchase scope includes these facilities

5) Reduction in the "window" of time allowed for members to make their purchase from the time they join the GPP: the window for new partners to consummate their purchase would be reduced from one year to six months from the date they join the partnership.

Of these, I'm keenest on No. 3. While it might reduce the amount of near-term capital flowing into the renewable energy market by not allowing users to pay, and take credit, for renewable energy that doesn't yet exist, it increases the near-term accountability of RECs. The credibility that will bring is priceless.

The current systems is explained by the EPA in its Guide to Purchasing Green Power:

"An alternative way to buy RECs is through a subscription, or 'future RECs,' which involves an up-front purchase of RECs to be generated in the future by a new renewable facility. The advantage of this approach is that it promotes new renewable facilities by providing up-front financial assistance for their development and construction. In return, the purchaser receives the RECs as they are generated over an extended period of years. Compared to annually buying RECS close to the time they are generated, the subscription method emphasizes the up-front payment for a future stream of RECs. The additional risk of this approach is that the plant might not be constructed, and buyers should investigate what remedy the seller proposes in such an event. As with all products, independent product certification and verification of the claims made is an important aspect to consider."

As evidenced by the totality of their efforts, Intel, named EPA Green Power Partner of the Year, and Cisco, ranked ninth on the EPA Top 50 list, will be environmental leaders regardless of the proposed changes.

In June 2008, Cisco announced a corporate global greenhouse gas reduction goal of 25% in absolute terms by 2012. Cisco now purchases 378 million kilowatt-hours of green power in the United States, supplied mainly from biomass, wind, solar, and small hydro sources.

Intelpowers more than 46% of its U.S. facilities through the purchase of more than 1.3 billion kilowatt-hours a year of RECs generated from wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass sources. Intel's venture capital arm, Intel Capital, invests in various green technologies, including solar photovoltaics. Besides promoting greater energy efficiency in its products and facilities, over the last six years Intel has invested over $21 million toward more than 250 energy conservation projects that saved more than 500 million kilowatt-hours.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links