Commentary

Bob Evans
Senior VP, Global CIO  

Won't Steal Corporate Data? You're In The Minority

The bad news on insider threats keeps getting worse: most respondents to a new database-security study think such attacks will accelerate in 2009 and that insiders will most likely be behind them. Yesterday I noted the huge risks from employees wanting some "insurance" in case they get laid off; today's culprits appear to be a mix of shortsighted budgeting, ignorance, and incompetence.

The bad news on insider threats keeps getting worse: most respondents to a new database-security study think such attacks will accelerate in 2009 and that insiders will most likely be behind them. Yesterday I noted the huge risks from employees wanting some "insurance" in case they get laid off; today's culprits appear to be a mix of shortsighted budgeting, ignorance, and incompetence.Yes, that's tough talk, but combined with new studies highlighted in yesterday's post about how a significant majority of employees are willing to steal corporate data out of fear of being laid off, these additional findings could well require CIOs to reset cybersecurity priorities and dollars. Just look at this answer to a question about which factors are keeping companies from improving the security of enterprise databases that those companies admit are vulnerable:

  • Don't have accurate inventory of our enterprise DB systems: 21%
  • Don't know which DBs contain secure, confidential data: 18%
  • Lack of appropriate DB security skills: 18%
  • Confusion over which group "owns" DB security: 15%
  • Lack of budget for security solutions: 40%

  • More Global CIO Insights

    White Papers

    More >>

    Reports

    More >>

    Webcasts

    More >>

    This is becoming a huge issue that CIOs will have to tackle in 2009, and these latest results from Enterprise Strategy Group underscore, once again, the grave danger posed by employees who are either looking to steal customer data or who are simply unaware of proper security policies. Look at these responses to a question about the root causes of confidential-data breaches that companies had to disclose in the past 12 months:

  • Insider physical method: 27%
  • Insider logical method: 23%
  • External logical method: 19%
  • Accidental loss of device: 14%
  • Combo of inside/outside: 11%
  • Don't know the cause: 4%
  • Human error: 3%
  • And, as if these numbers haven't caused enough heartburn and indigestion, let me heap on a few more habaneros: "Nearly 84% of respondents believe that all or most of their confidential data is protected. This perception is disconnected from reality, as the same respondents noted they failed security audits more than 33% of the time (HIPAA, SOX, FISMA, etc.)." This last bit is from a press release about the study from Application Security, which sponsored the study and said that contact information for obtaining a copy of the report is available here.


    Related Reading




    Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

    Single tags

    These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

    <br> Defines a single line break

    <hr> Defines a horizontal line

    Matching tags

    These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

    <a> Defines an anchor

    <b> Defines bold text

    <big> Defines big text

    <blockquote> Defines a long quotation

    <caption> Defines a table caption

    <cite> Defines a citation

    <code> Defines computer code text

    <em> Defines emphasized text

    <fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

    <h1> This is heading 1

    <h2> This is heading 2

    <h3> This is heading 3

    <h4> This is heading 4

    <h5> This is heading 5

    <h6> This is heading 6

    <i> Defines italic text

    <p> Defines a paragraph

    <pre> Defines preformatted text

    <q> Defines a short quotation

    <samp> Defines sample computer code text

    <small> Defines small text

    <span> Defines a section in a document

    <s> Defines strikethrough text

    <strike> Defines strikethrough text

    <strong> Defines strong text

    <sub> Defines subscripted text

    <sup> Defines superscripted text

    <u> Defines underlined text

    InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

    Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
    T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
    Subscribe to RSS

    Resource Links