Commentary
Google Kills Off iPhone-Optimized iGoogle
Without warning or announcement of any kind, Google is redirecting iPhone traffic away from the iPhone-specific version of iGoogle to a unified version instead. iGoogle for the iPhone was first introduced in January of 2008. Why the sudden change?Without warning or announcement of any kind, Google is redirecting iPhone traffic away from the iPhone-specific version of iGoogle to a unified version instead. iGoogle for the iPhone was first introduced in January of 2008. Why the sudden change?iPhone users had been granted their very own special version of iGoogle for the past year. It gathered all of a user's content and lumped it into a single column that was easy to navigate and scroll through. It was a nice, customizable way to access your favorite Google services from the iPhone.
Now, iPhone users who go to iGoogle are being directed to the same version of iGoogle that is available to other mobile phone platforms. Since Google has remained mum on the subject, there could be any number of reasons for the change.
More Internet Insights
White Papers
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
Reports
- How Google+, Facebook Impact Corporate Strategy: Social Media and IT at a Crossroads
- IT Pro Impact: NFC and Mobile Commerce
Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- Server Virtualization Gets Relief From Tivoli Storage Manager for Virtual Environments
The Unofficial Apple Weblog suspects that, "The unification of the mobile iGoogle interface may simply be an effort by Google to level the playing field instead of having the iPhone as a most-favored-device, or it might be part and parcel of the big G's shaving down on costs by eliminating offerings."
I doubt it is really this clear-cut. Google still makes other iPhone-specific applications and features. Why it would choose to kill off just one really doesn't make much sense. Google makes specific versions of applications for other platforms, such as Windows Mobile and BlackBerry OS. Does this mean users of those devices should be expecting change, too?
Does it really cost that much to format Web pages for a specific device? Is Google saving all that much money by serving up the same version of iGoogle to all mobile devices? Seems to me the cost here is negligible, especially since it already was developed a year ago.
Either way you look at it, iGoogle for the iPhone is i-outta here.
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- How To Regain IT Control In An Increasingly Mobile World - by BlackBerry
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
Featured Resource
Download this whitepaper and find out how to easily manage web content by categorizing it into a discrete number of categories.
Learn More












